The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S. D., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,668
Practical Statistics for Medical Research
Altman, D. G. (1990) · doi:10.1201/9780429258589 · Cited by 10,668
An Introduction to Medical Statistics.
(1931) · Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1931.02730150055037 · Cited by 2,084
Swinscow, T. D. V., & Campbell, M. J. (1976) · Cited by 757
An Introduction to Medical Statistics
GREENWOOD, M. (1932) · Nature · doi:10.1038/129188a0 · Cited by 388
Greenhalgh, P., & Greenhalgh, T. (1999) · Cited by 335
Critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials
Elwood, M. (1998) · Cited by 220
Critical Appraisal of Epidemiological Studies and Clinical Trials
Elwood, M. (2017) · doi:10.1093/med/9780199682898.001.0001 · Cited by 29
Cited by
Translation of proteomic biomarkers into FDA approved cancer diagnostics: issues and challenges
Füzéry, A. K., Levin, J., Chan, M. M., & Chan, D. W. (2013) · Clinical Proteomics · doi:10.1186/1559-0275-10-13 · Cited by 428
Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
Howcroft, J., Kofman, J., & Lemaire, E. D. (2013) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-91 · Cited by 377
Advances in the Diagnosis of Human Schistosomiasis
Weerakoon, K. G. A. D., Gobert, G. N., Cai, P., & McManus, D. P. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00137-14 · Cited by 323
Development of machine learning models for diagnosis of glaucoma
Kim, S. J., Cho, K. J., & Oh, S. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177726 · Cited by 266
Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis
Campbell, J. M., Klugar, M., Ding, S., Carmody, D. P., Hakonsen, S. J., Jadotte, Y. T., White, S., & Munn, Z. (2015) · International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare · doi:10.1097/xeb.0000000000000061 · Cited by 193
Metadata
- Authors
- Lalkhen, A. G., & McCluskey, A.
- Venue
- Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 221-223
- ISSN
- 1472-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-1816
- OpenAlex
- W2147595228
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041
- The paper
- Lalkhen, A. G., & McCluskey, A. (2008). Clinical tests: sensitivity and specificity. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkn041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.