Cited by 10Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsDiabetes Management and ResearchEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

The rationale and the strategies to achieve perioperative glycaemic control

Open access
Stubbs, Daniel J, Levy, Nicholas, Dhatariya, Ketan·2017·BJA Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjaed/mkw071

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Stubbs, D. J., Levy, N., & Dhatariya, K.
Affiliations
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
  • West Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Levy, Nicholas
Venue
BJA Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
185-193
ISSN
2058-5349 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2591042699
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
BJA Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, HbA1c, capillary blood glucose, surgical risk, infection risk, elective surgery, length of hospital stay, surgical morbidity and mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review