The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Transformation of Policing? Understanding Current Trends in Policing Systems
Abstract
This paper considers David Bayley and Clifford Shearing's (1996) argument that policing systems in developed economies are currently undergoing radical change. It is clear that a number of significant shifts have occurred including major reforms in public policing, and a substantial expansion of the private security industry. However, we question the degree to which current developments in policing should be interpreted as a sharp qualitative break with the past. By focusing primarily upon change the risk is that we overlook the significant consistencies and continuities that are equally important in understanding historical trends. We also question the extent to which the developments highlighted within this transformation thesis can be seen as global. We argue that the transformation thesis fails to take sufficient account of important differences between the nature and form of policing in North America, and of that in other countries such as Britain. We conclude by arguing that it is helpful to locate the set of changes within the framework of policing in a wider context. Thus, rather than view current developments as a fragmentation of policing, we see them as part of a long‐term process of formalizaton of social control. The key development that appears to have taken place concerns shifts between what we term primary and secondary social control activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-2454 · Cited by 28,789
The Death and Life of Great American Cities
Jacobs, J. (2015) · Readings in Planning Theory · doi:10.1002/9781119084679.ch4 · Cited by 8,033
THE NEW PENOLOGY: NOTES ON THE EMERGING STRATEGY OF CORRECTIONS AND ITS IMPLICATIONS*
FEELEY, M. M., & SIMON, J. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x · Cited by 2,434
The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism
Leana, C. R., & Sennett, R. (2000) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259274 · Cited by 2,351
Felson, M., & Boba, R. (2010) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781483349299 · Cited by 1,435
Ericson, R. V., & Haggerty, K. D. (1997) · University of Toronto Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198265535.001.0001 · Cited by 1,285
The spirit of community: rights, responsibilities, and the Communitarian agenda
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-1818 · Cited by 830
Bayley, D. H. (1994) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195091168.001.0001 · Cited by 765
Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (1996) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.2307/3054129 · Cited by 681
Undercover: police surveillance in America
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-2186 · Cited by 525
Cited by
(2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511491207 · Cited by 461
Crawford, A. (2006) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480606068874 · Cited by 301
Kim, S., & Lee, H. (2026) · Policing: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/pijpsm-09-2025-0185
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, T.
- Venue
- British Journal of Criminology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-146
- ISSN
- 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3529
- OpenAlex
- W2125737793
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 104.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Transformation of Policing? Understanding Current Trends in Policing Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bjc/42.1.129
- The paper
- Jones, T. (2002). The Transformation of Policing? Understanding Current Trends in Policing Systems. British Journal of Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/42.1.129
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.