Cited by 12Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyPolicing Practices and Perceptions

Punishing the Non-convicted Through Disclosure of Police Records

Maurutto, Paula, Hannah-Moffat, Kelly, Quirouette, Marianne·2023·The British Journal of Criminology

Abstract

As police records expand with big data analytics, so too has the range of non-conviction information seeping into the public domain through criminal background checks. Numerous studies have documented the negative effects of background checks for those with criminal convictions, but less understood are the effects of non-conviction records. We draw on 8 focus groups and 52 interviews to understand how the release of non-conviction records are: (1) creating new institutional risk management pressures for police institutions, (2) expanding the role of employers as arbiters of risk, (3) redefining understandings of ‘the risky subject’ to include victims, those with mental health challenges and other innocent individuals subject to police contact and (4) raising critical legal questions about privacy and presumptions of innocence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjc/azac092

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Maurutto, P., Hannah-Moffat, K., & Quirouette, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Sociology and Centre of Criminology and Sociolegal Studies, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Maurutto, Paula
Venue
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2023-02-18
Volume
63
Issue
6
Pages
1368-1383
ISSN
  • 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3529
OpenAlex
W4321332215
Cited by
12
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
5.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (584978)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
Keywords
criminal background checks, risk management, employer screening, victims, mental health, privacy, presumption of innocence, big data analytics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review