Punishing the Non-convicted Through Disclosure of Police Records
Abstract
As police records expand with big data analytics, so too has the range of non-conviction information seeping into the public domain through criminal background checks. Numerous studies have documented the negative effects of background checks for those with criminal convictions, but less understood are the effects of non-conviction records. We draw on 8 focus groups and 52 interviews to understand how the release of non-conviction records are: (1) creating new institutional risk management pressures for police institutions, (2) expanding the role of employers as arbiters of risk, (3) redefining understandings of ‘the risky subject’ to include victims, those with mental health challenges and other innocent individuals subject to police contact and (4) raising critical legal questions about privacy and presumptions of innocence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This describing has justified significant expansion of the reach of criminal justice system in Canada.
“It has, nevertheless, justified significant expansion of the reach of criminal justice system in Canada (Maurutto et al., 2023).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Maurutto et al., 2023
Cites
Pager, D. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374403 · Cited by 2,840 · see citing works
The Labor Market Consequences of Incarceration
Western, B., Kling, J. R., & Weiman, D. F. (2001) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/0011128701047003007 · Cited by 499 · see citing works
Koops, B.-J. (2021) · Law Innovation and Technology · doi:10.1080/17579961.2021.1898299 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
DOES CONVICTION AFFECT EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES?
BOSHIER, R., & JOHNSON, D. (1974) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjc.a046561 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barmaki, R. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00170-8 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Maurutto, P., Hannah-Moffat, K., & Quirouette, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Sociology and Centre of Criminology and Sociolegal Studies, University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Maurutto, Paula
- Venue
- The British Journal of Criminology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-02-18
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1368-1383
- ISSN
- 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3529
- OpenAlex
- W4321332215
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 5.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (584978)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Keywords
- criminal background checks, risk management, employer screening, victims, mental health, privacy, presumption of innocence, big data analytics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review