Cited by 69Crime, Deviance, and Social ControlMusic History and CultureNight-time city culture

Digital street culture decoded: why criminalizing drill music is street illiterate and counterproductive

Ilan, Jonathan·2020·The British Journal of Criminology

Abstract

Abstract Authorities in the United Kingdom censure ‘drill rap’, the artistic expression of disadvantaged urban youth, citing its connections to serious violence. This is shown to be based on a thin, ‘street-illiterate’ understanding of the genre that ultimately rests on stereotypes of young black men as violent ‘gang’ members. In place of this misreading, a street-literate interpretation of drill is offered from a deep and nuanced analysis of YouTube videos and below the line discussions. It is demonstrated that it is inaccurate and unhelpful to view drill videos as evidence of violent crime or as attempts to glorify or precipitate it. Instead, the stylized videos and violent lyricism are shown to be forms of artistic performance that reveal an ambiguous relationship to criminality. Marginalizing the excluded further, video removals and restrictions on performance are shown to be counterproductive from a crime-reduction perspective. New developments in technology and culture can take shape around existing patterns of criminalization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjc/azz086

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • UK drill music has gripped the popular and penal imagination as a veritable social problem that generates noisy headlines and attracts heavy-handed criminal justice system responses.

    “UK drill music has gripped the popular and penal imagination as a veritable social problem that generates noisy headlines and attracts heavy-handed criminal justice system responses (Fatsis, 2019b; Ilan, 2020; Lynes et al . 2021).”
  • Connecting drill music with 'gang violence' is 'street illiterate and resonates with patterns of stereotyping and criminalization', especially 'in the absence of excellent local context and knowledge, as well as specific evidence'.

    “Connecting drill music with 'gang violence', however is 'street illiterate and resonates with patterns of stereotyping and criminalization'; especially 'in the absence of excellent local context and knowledge, as well as specific evidence' (Ilan, 2020: 1005).”
  • These compilation videos provide further justification for the discriminatory suppression of drill by the UK criminal justice system.

    “They also provide further justification for the discriminatory suppression of drill by the UK criminal justice system (Quinn, 2018; Fatsis, 2019b; 2021b; Ilan, 2020; Owusu-Bempah, 2020, 2022).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 70 · Cited by 69

Authors
Ilan, J.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Ilan, Jonathan
Venue
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2020-01-15
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
994-1013
ISSN
  • 0007-0955 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3529
OpenAlex
W3000149189
Cited by
69
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3
FWCI
10.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The British Journal of Criminology (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Music History and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Night-time city culture
Keywords
drill music, criminalization, urban youth, Black men, YouTube videos, crime reduction, stereotypes, artistic performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review