Cited by 2Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders researchAI in cancer detectionArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Self-supervised artificial intelligence system for differentiating mycosis fungoides and benign inflammatory dermatoses

Zhao, Jie, Bai, Juan, Li, Guomin, Sun, Qingmiao, Li, Sheng, Wang, Chen, Li, Hui, Xue, Ruzeng +1 more·2026·British Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, is challenging to diagnose in its early stages because the clinical and histopathological features often overlap with benign inflammatory dermatoses (BIDs), leading to misclassification and delayed treatment. Objectives: To evaluate whether a self-supervised artificial intelligence (AI) system can support diagnostic decision-making in MF and common inflammatory mimics. Methods: This retrospective two-centre study included patients with confirmed diagnoses of MF or BIDs. A self-supervised multimodal system integrating whole-slide histopathology and routine clinical variables was developed to perform multiclass differential classification across MF and common BIDs. Cases were partitioned into training, internal validation and independent external validation cohorts at the patient level. Clinical utility was assessed in a reader study in which dermatopathologists reviewed cases with and without system assistance. Results: Across 786 whole-slide images from 532 patients, the multimodal model achieved macro-area under the curves > 0.85 in both validation sets, with a macro-balanced accuracy of 0.837 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.778–0.897; n = 106] internally and 0.762 (95% CI 0.724–0.802; n = 260) externally, representing improved performance over the unimodal histopathology model. In the reader study, AI assistance was associated with improved macro-balanced accuracy among junior (from 0.778 to 0.818) and senior (from 0.805 to 0.859) dermatopathologists, accompanied by consistent improvements in macro-averaged sensitivity and specificity across all diagnostic categories. Interpretability analyses generated heatmaps that were generally consistent with recognized histopathological features of MF and BIDs, aligning with dermatopathologist interpretation. Conclusions: This multimodal, self-supervised system may support dermatopathologists by providing interpretable, probability-based guidance for the classification of MF and its common inflammatory mimics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjd/ljag129

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, J., Bai, J., Li, G., Sun, Q., Li, S., Wang, C., Li, H., Xue, R., & Qiao, J.
Affiliations
  • First Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University (CN)
  • Southern Medical University (CN)
Venue
British Journal of Dermatology
Published
2026-04-09
Volume
195
Issue
1
Pages
136-145
ISSN
  • 0007-0963 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2133
OpenAlex
W7153852720
Cited by
2
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
13.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFC2508106)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
mycosis fungoides, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, differential diagnosis, self-supervised learning, multimodal AI, whole slide images, dermatopathology, AI-assisted diagnosis, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review