Many Worlds and Schrödinger’s First Quantum Theory
Open accessAbstract
Schrödinger’s first proposal for the interpretation of quantum mechanics was based on a postulate relating the wave function on configuration space to charge density in physical space. Schrödinger apparently later thought that his proposal was empirically wrong. We argue here that this is not the case, at least for a very similar proposal with charge density replaced by mass density. We argue that when analyzed carefully, this theory is seen to be an empirically adequate many-worlds theory and not an empirically inadequate theory describing a single world. Moreover, this formulation—Schrödinger’s first quantum theory—can be regarded as a formulation of the many-worlds view of quantum mechanics that is ontologically clearer than Everett’s. 1. Monstrosity2. Duality3. Parallelity4. Reality5. Nonlocality6. Relativity7. Probability8. Typicality9. Uncertainty10. Summary
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Everett's theory can be 'locally' formulated in terms of mass density.
“We stress that in [40], it was similarly shown that Everett's theory can be 'locally' formulated in term of mass density.”
From An Elementary Proof That Everett's Quantum Multiverse Is Nonlocal: Bell-Locality and Branch-Symmetry in the Many-Worlds Interpretation (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
Section 2, p. 3 formulates Sm, a many-worlds theory, using mass density in physical three-dimensional space. But Section 5, p. 13 explicitly says Sm cannot be formulated purely in terms of local variables because it also needs the nonlocal wave function. Thus the citation supports a mass-density formulation, not a local formulation in that stronger sense. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 71
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Allori, V. [2007]: Fundamental Physical Theories: Mathematical Structures Grounded on a Primitive Ontology, Ph.D. thesis , Department of Philosophy: Rutgers University, <www.niu.edu/~vallori/thesis4.pdf>
- Bell J. S., 1976, Epistemological Letters, 9
- Bell J. S., 1987, Quantum Gravity 2, 37
- Bell J. S., 1986, Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 65: Possible Worlds in Arts and Sciences
- Bell J. S., 1987, Schrödinger. Centenary Celebration of a Polymath, 52
- Bell J. S., Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics
- Bohm D., Variables, I and II, 93
- Chalmers D., The Conscious Mind
- DeWitt B., [1973]: The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
- Everett, H. [1955]: The Theory of the Universal Wavefunction, Ph.D. thesis , Department of Physics: Princeton University, Reprinted in (DeWitt and Graham [1973], pp. 3–140).
- Goldstein S., 1998, Part one, 42
- Goldstein S., J. Bricmont, D. Dürr, M. C. Galavotti, G. C. Ghirardi, F. Petruccione and N. Zanghì (eds), Chance in Physics: Foundations and Perspectives, 54
- Gott J. R., Time Travel in Einstein’s Universe
- Nelson E., Quantum Fluctuations
- Saunders S., Perspectives on Quantum Reality, 42
- Schrödinger E., Collected Papers on Wave Mechanics, translated by J. F
- Tegmark M., J. D. Barrow
- von Neumann J., 1955, Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik
- Authors
- Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N.
- Affiliations
- Northern Illinois University (US)
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova (IT)
- Venue
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-27
- ISSN
- 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3537
- OpenAlex
- W2054701681
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Huskie Commons (Northern Illinois University) (submittedVersion)
- Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- many-worlds interpretation, wave functions, charge density, mass density, empirical adequacy, quantum ontology, nonlocality, probability in quantum mechanics, uncertainty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
