Cited by 71Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsPhilosophy and History of SciencePhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Many Worlds and Schrödinger’s First Quantum Theory

Open access
Allori, Valia, Goldstein, Sheldon, Tumulka, Roderich, Zanghì, Nino·2011·The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Abstract

Schrödinger’s first proposal for the interpretation of quantum mechanics was based on a postulate relating the wave function on configuration space to charge density in physical space. Schrödinger apparently later thought that his proposal was empirically wrong. We argue here that this is not the case, at least for a very similar proposal with charge density replaced by mass density. We argue that when analyzed carefully, this theory is seen to be an empirically adequate many-worlds theory and not an empirically inadequate theory describing a single world. Moreover, this formulation—Schrödinger’s first quantum theory—can be regarded as a formulation of the many-worlds view of quantum mechanics that is ontologically clearer than Everett’s. 1. Monstrosity2. Duality3. Parallelity4. Reality5. Nonlocality6. Relativity7. Probability8. Typicality9. Uncertainty10. Summary

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjps/axp053

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Everett's theory can be 'locally' formulated in terms of mass density.

    “We stress that in [40], it was similarly shown that Everett's theory can be 'locally' formulated in term of mass density.”

    From An Elementary Proof That Everett's Quantum Multiverse Is Nonlocal: Bell-Locality and Branch-Symmetry in the Many-Worlds Interpretation (2023) · cites this paper as [40]

    Section 2, p. 3 formulates Sm, a many-worlds theory, using mass density in physical three-dimensional space. But Section 5, p. 13 explicitly says Sm cannot be formulated purely in terms of local variables because it also needs the nonlocal wave function. Thus the citation supports a mass-density formulation, not a local formulation in that stronger sense. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 27 · Cited by 71

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2][2] Allori, V.: Fundamental Physical Theories: Mathematical Structures Grounded on a Primitive Ontology . Ph. D. thesis, Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University (2007). Online http://www.niu.edu/ ~ vallori/thesis4.pdf -
  2. [7][7] Bell, J. S.: The Theory of Local Beables. Epistemological Letters 9 : 11 (1976). Reprinted in Dialectica 39 : 85 (1985), and as chapter 7 of [11]. -
  3. [8][8] Bell, J. S.: Quantum Mechanics for Cosmologists. In C. Isham, R. Penrose, and D. Sciama (editors), Quantum Gravity 2 , 611-637. Oxford: Clarendon Press (1981). Reprinted as chapter 15 of [11]. -
  4. [9][9] Bell, J. S.: Six possible worlds of quantum mechanics. Proceedings of the Nobel Symposium 65: Possible Worlds in Arts and Sciences. Stockholm, August 11-15, 1986. Reprinted as chapter 20 of
  5. [10][10] Bell, J. S.: Are There Quantum Jumps? In C. W. Kilmister (editor) Schr¨ odinger. Centenary Celebration of a Polymath , 41-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1987). Reprinted as chapter 22 of [11]. - [11] Bell, J. S.: Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1987). -
  6. [13][13] Bohm, D.: A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of 'Hidden' Variables, I and II. Physical Review 85 : 166-193 (1952). -
  7. [14][14] Chalmers, D.: The Conscious Mind . Oxford: Oxford University Press (1996). -
  8. [18][18] DeWitt, B., Graham, R.N. (ed.s): The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton Series in Physics). Princeton: Princeton University Press (1973). -
  9. [21][21] Everett, H.: The Theory of the Universal Wavefunction . Ph. D. thesis, Department of Physics, Princeton University (1955). Reprinted as pp 3-140 of [18]. -
  10. [32][32] Nelson, E.: Quantum Fluctuations. Princeton: Princeton University Press (1985). -
  11. [33][33] Saunders, S.: Relativism. In R. Clifton, ed., Perspectives on Quantum Reality , 125-142. Dordrecht: Kluwer (1995). -
  12. [42][42] von Neumann, J.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics . Princeton: Princeton University Press (1955). Translation of Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1932). -

Authors
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghì, N.
Affiliations
  • Northern Illinois University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Genova (IT)
Venue
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Published
2011-03-01
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 0007-0882 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3537
OpenAlex
W2054701681
Cited by
71
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Huskie Commons (Northern Illinois University) (submittedVersion)
  • Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
many-worlds interpretation, wave functions, charge density, mass density, empirical adequacy, quantum ontology, nonlocality, probability in quantum mechanics, uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review