Cited by 7Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchCancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune ResponseEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of beta-blockers and other non-cancer drugs on outcomes after pancreatic cancer resection

Open access

Abstract

The mainstay of therapy for pancreatic cancer with curative intent remains surgical resection. The perioperative phase is characterized by physiological and psychological stress reactions mediated mainly by an excess release of catecholamines and prostaglandins, which may have protumorigenic effects1. These effects could potentially be inhibited by usual beta-blockers and cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibitors in terms of drug repurposing, but there is conflicting evidence for the influence of beta-blockers and other non-cancer drugs in the perioperative setting. This retrospective analysis of the institution’s prospective pancreatic database assessed the influence of beta-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid as well as their combined use, angiotensin-converting inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor type 1 antagonists, statins, and calcium channel blockers on perioperative outcome and survival of patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer. A logistic regression model was used to assess the influence of the different medications on postoperative morbidity and mortality. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were computed to evaluate the influence of individual variables on survival. Furthermore, 1 : 1 matching by the nearest-neighbour method, considering the variables age, sex, AJCC stage, ASA grade, arterial hypertension, and other cardiovascular co-morbidities, was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances. A total of 914 adults undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer were analysed, of whom 263 (28.8 per cent) were receiving concurrent beta-blocker therapy. The mean(s.d.) age of the cohort was 65.6(10.3) years and 422 of the patients (46.2 per cent) were women. Patients under beta-blocker therapy were older, and more likely to have an ASA fitness grade of III or higher and co-morbidities, especially hypertension and other cardiovascular co-morbidities. The medications had no influence on postoperative morbidity and mortality, in particular no effect on pancreas-specific complications such as pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy haemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and intra-abdominal abscess. Patients using beta-blockers (HR for death 1.19, 95 per cent c.i. 1.00 to 1.41; P = 0.047) and those taking acetylsalicylic acid (HR 1.24, 1.01 to 1.54; P = 0.044) showed impaired overall survival in the unadjusted survival analyses, whereas all other medications investigated had no impact on survival. However, the negative impact on survival diminished in the multivariable analysis, and also in the propensity score-matched cohort after adjusting for baseline imbalances in age and co-morbidities. In multivariable analysis, negative prognostic factors were age at least 67 years, neoadjuvant therapy, ASA grade III or higher, AJCC stage III, and R1 resection (Fig. 1). The only positive prognostic factor was concurrent statin use (HR 0.76, 95 per cent c.i. 0.58 to 0.99). Forest plot of multivariate cox regression analysis of overall survival The analysis included 914 patients. HRs are shown with 95% confidence intervals. ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker. Several studies have reported a positive effect of beta-blocker therapy with regard to short-term2 and long-term3 outcomes after cancer surgery. These effects could not be reproduced in the present study. The survival difference in the unadjusted analyses, which was not present in the adjusted and matched analyses, can be explained for the main part by the greater co-morbidity in patients in the beta-blocker group and their older age. The only medication with a potentially positive effect on survival was statin use, which is in line with a recent population-based study from Norway4. Nevertheless, this finding needs to be further explored in future studies alongside other innovative approaches to harnessing the perioperative phase for cancer-directed therapy. One such approach is currently being investigated in the randomized controlled PROSPER trial, which is assessing whether the combination of propranolol, a non-selective beta-blocker, and etodolac, a COX-2-inhibitor, may have a positive effect in beta-blocker-naive patients undergoing pancreatic cancer surgery5. The authors have no funding to declare. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjs/znac434

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a retrospective analysis of the institutional pancreatic database at the University of Heidelberg, almost 30% of patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer received concurrent betablocker therapy.

    “In a retrospective analysis of the institutional pancreatic database at the University of Heidelberg, almost 30% of patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer received concurrent betablocker therapy [20] corroborating this frequent reason for exclusion.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ricon, 2019, Perioperative biobehavioral interventions to prevent cancer recurrence through combined inhibition of beta-adrenergic and cyclooxygenase 2 signaling, Cancer, 125, 45, 10.1002/cncr.31594 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ahl, 2019, Effect of beta-blocker therapy on early mortality after emergency colonic cancer surgery, Br J Surg, 106, 477, 10.1002/bjs.10988 · DOI
  3. Ahl, 2020, Beta-blockade in rectal cancer surgery: a simple measure of improving outcomes, Ann Surg, 271, 140, 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002970 · DOI
  4. Støer, 2021, Use of non-cancer drugs and survival among patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a nationwide registry-based study in Norway, Acta Oncol, 60, 1146, 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1953136 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hüttner, F. J., Mauch, M., Heckler, M., Hackert, T., Büchler, M. W., Probst, P., & Diener, M. K.
Affiliations
Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Büchler, Markus W
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2023-02-02
Volume
110
Issue
4
Pages
498-499
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W4318933958
Cited by
7
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British journal of surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
beta-blockers, pancreatic cancer surgery, perioperative drug therapy, aspirin, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, statins, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, postoperative morbidity, postoperative mortality, overall survival, drug repurposing, perioperative stress response, pancreatic fistula
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Humans, Pancreas, Pancreatic Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review