Cited by 7Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy TechniquesColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

Intraoperative quantification of fluorescence angiography for assessment of intestinal perfusion: in vivo exploration of clinical value

Open access
Vaassen, Harry G. M., Wermelink, Bryan, Manohar, Srirang, Geelkerken, Robert H., Lips, Daan J.·2022·BJS Open

Abstract

Dear Editor Perfusion status of the intestine is regarded as one of the most critical factors for anastomotic leakage specifically, and intestinal viability in general1. Currently this is evaluated by means of clinical observations such as serosal discoloration and arterial pulsation; however, this is subjective, and it has been demonstrated that surgeons lack predictive accuracy regarding AL2. The decision to resect suspected non-viable tissue in the case of acute mesenteric ischaemia or bowel incarceration is often based on clinical inspection and surgeon’s experience. The surgeon must balance the risk subjectively of leaving non-viable bowel in situ versus small bowel resection and consequent risk of short bowel syndrome. There is a need for objective and reliable intraoperative assessment of intestinal perfusion. Fluorescence angiography (FA) with indocyanine green (ICG) provides valuable insights into local perfusion dynamics, but qualitative interpretation of images can be deceptive and seems to be inadequate in reducing AL3. Quantitative assessment may improve interpretation but remains challenging due to the lack of standardization, absence of robust metrics for ICG kinetics, and paucity of reference quantified data in healthy and impaired perfusion situations4. This study presents the first clinical findings after implementing a method that allows semi-automatic live quantification of bowel perfusion based on FA inflow parameters. Algorithms for the onsite extraction of FA inflow parameters time to peak (TTP) and normalized peak slope (NPS) were developed (Appendix S1). An accompanying in-house-built software tool enabled real-time quantified analysis and integration of parametric mapping with live video footage. A database of 32 FA recordings in patients without impaired bowel perfusion was retrospectively analysed to provide a reference of ‘healthy’ normal values5. Nine patients with suspected bowel perfusion impairment, of which seven underwent a restoration of vascularization, were prospectively included. These procedures consisted of five open superior mesenteric artery reconstructions for chronic mesenteric ischaemia, two laparotomies for acute mesenteric ischaemia, and two laparoscopic reductions of small bowel strangulation. Characteristics of these patients, diagnoses, and performed interventions are presented in Table S1. FA was performed on small bowel segments after intravenous administration of 5 mg ICG, before, and after revascularization. Analysis of the group with unimpaired bowel perfusion provided a median (interquartile range (i.q.r.)) TTP of 4.8 (2.5) s, with 95 per cent of measurements under 7.0 s. Median (i.q.r.) NPS was found to be 12.8 (5.1) per cent/s, with 95 per cent of measurements more than 9.4 per cent/s. The group with suspected impaired perfusion showed a median (i.q.r.) TTP of 9.6 (3.2) s and median (i.q.r.) NPS of 7.3 (1.9) per cent/s, both significantly different compared with the unimpaired group (P = 0.002). Measurements after vascularization was restored demonstrated a median (i.q.r.) TTP of 4.2 (1.6) s and a median (i.q.r.) NPS of 14.5 (3.3) per cent/s, which differed significantly from the median before intervention (P = 0.033). Seven out of nine patients with suspected impaired bowel perfusion displayed inflow parameters outside the healthy range. Six of the seven patients who underwent revascularization showed evident improvement of inflow parameters, as well as resolution of symptoms (see example in Fig. 1). The remaining patient suffered from recurrent atypical abdominal symptoms. All measurements are presented in Table S2 and Fig. S1. Intraoperative fluorescence angiography analysis of a patient with chronic mesenteric ischaemia (Pt. A4) before (left) and after (right) superior mesenteric artery revascularization. Left arrow indicates ileum, and right arrow indicates jejunum. a,e Monochromatic near-infrared imaging mode. b,f Intensity-over-time curves of the jejunal and ileal segment. AU, arbitrary units. c,g White-light imaging mode. d,h Heat map based on time to peak overlayed on white-light footage. This study suggests that this method for onsite FA quantification yields inflow-based parameters that enable discrimination between healthy and impaired perfusion and reflect corresponding symptoms. Further sufficiently powered clinical trials are being conducted to define FA thresholds for various perfusion requirements. Disclosure. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Supplementary material is available at BJS Open online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac058

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real time ICGFI quantification using time to peak, slope of fluorescent intensity, and background subtracted peak fluorescent intensity may predict tissue injury, especially if visual assessment is difficult.

    “Real time ICGFI quantification using time to peak, slope of fluorescent intensity, and background subtracted peak fluorescent intensity may predict tissue injury, especially if visual assessment is difficult. 119,171,172”

    From Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2025 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Diseases of the Mesenteric and Renal Arteries and Veins. (2025) · cites this paper as [119]

    The paper’s main text (page not provided) describes real-time ICG fluorescence quantification using time to peak and normalized peak slope, and reports that these measures distinguished healthy from impaired bowel perfusion. It also notes the limitations of visual assessment. It does not report background-subtracted peak fluorescence intensity or establish prediction of tissue injury, rather than impaired perfusion. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery 2006; 26: 131– 136 16518804
  2. [2]Karliczek A, Harlaar NJ, Zeebregts CJ, Wiggers T, Baas PC, van Dam GM. Surgeons lack predictive accuracy for anastomotic leakage in gastrointestinal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 569– 576 19221768
  3. [3]Jafari MD, Wexner SD, Martz JE, McLemore EC, Margolin DA, Sherwinter DA et al Perfusion assessment in laparoscopic left-sided/anterior resection (PILLAR II): a multi-institutional study. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220: 82– 92.e1 25451666
  4. [4]Lütken CD, Achiam MP, Svendsen MB, Boni L, Nerup N. Optimizing quantitative fluorescence angiography for visceral perfusion assessment. Surg Endosc 2020; 34: 5223– 5233 32696147
  5. [5]Vaassen HGM, Wermelink B, Geelkerken RH, Lips DJ. Fluorescence-based quantification of gastrointestinal perfusion: a step towards an automated approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 2021; 32: 293– 298 33739876

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaassen, H. G. M., Wermelink, B., Manohar, S., Geelkerken, R. H., & Lips, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Twente (NL)
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente (NL)
Corresponding author
Wermelink, Bryan
Venue
BJS Open
Published
2022-05-02
Volume
6
Issue
3
ISSN
2474-9842 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226245680
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1
FWCI
1.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BJS Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Keywords
fluorescence angiography, indocyanine green, intestinal perfusion, anastomotic leakage, acute mesenteric ischemia, chronic mesenteric ischemia, bowel strangulation, time to peak, bowel viability, revascularization, small bowel resection, parametric mapping, reference values
MeSH terms
Fluorescein Angiography, Humans, Indocyanine Green, Intestines, Perfusion, Anastomotic Leak

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review