The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Virtue Ethics and Social Work: Being Lucky, Realistic, and not Doing ones Duty
Open accessAbstract
This article argues that in a complex socio‐political world, social work ethics needs to re‐cast the moral identity of the social worker in terms of virtue ethics. We review virtue theory's Aristotelian foundations and criticisms of Kantian and utilitarian theory and show how they apply to social work. Subsequently we offer an account of a virtue‐based social work that questions the validity of several models of practice currently fashionable. Virtue theory emphasizes the priority of the individual moral agent who has acquired virtues commensurate with the pursuit of a revisable conception of the good life—the well‐being of all in a defined community. The virtues are the acquired inner qualities of humans—character—the possession of which, if applied in due measure, will typically contribute to the realization of the good life or ‘eudaimonia’. The role of the virtuous social worker is shown to be one that necessitates appropriate application of intellectual and practical virtues such as justice, reflection, perception, judgement, bravery, prudence, liberality and temperance. This ‘self‐flourishing’ worker, in bringing together the capacity for theoretical and practical action makes possible a hermeneutic or interpretive praxis best appraised in dialogue with fellow‐practitioners and clients. With a social work remit increasingly routinized by accountability, quality control and risk management there is an emphasis on regulation and duties. This has produced a culture of following approved or typical processes resulting in defensive forms of social work wholly uncongenial to the development of human qualities likely to promote social workers' engagement in critique and revision of what counts as best practice. In sum, our core proposition is that social work practice and education, to fit an unpredictable, non‐linear world, should develop means by which professionals nurture the virtues. This would reflexively enhance social work itself.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 28 · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- McBeath, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- McBeath, G.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1015-1036
- ISSN
- 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-263X
- OpenAlex
- W2128617239
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Sciences and Policies
- Keywords
- virtue ethics, social work ethics, Kantian ethics, utilitarianism, eudaimonia, professional accountability, risk management, social work practice models, social work education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virtue Ethics and Social Work: Being Lucky, Realistic, and not Doing ones Duty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bjsw/32.8.1015
- The paper
- McBeath, G. (2002). Virtue Ethics and Social Work: Being Lucky, Realistic, and not Doing ones Duty. British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/32.8.1015