Cited by 74Artificial Intelligence in EducationSocial Work Education and PracticeDigital Education and Society

Problematising Artificial Intelligence in Social Work Education: Challenges, Issues and Possibilities

Open access
Hodgson, David, Goldingay, Sophie, Boddy, Jennifer, Nipperess, Sharlene, Watts, Lynelle·2022·The British Journal of Social Work

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the fourth industrial revolution, and in higher education it will fundamentally transform the work of academics and higher education administrators. AI will also have several implications for students, including a reconsideration of what sorts of skills and knowledge should be taught and developed in the academy to prepare students for digital working lives. As social work educators, we have begun to wonder what the implications of AI in the academy will have for social work education. For educators, there are implications for pedagogy that go well beyond the introduction of new digital tools that merely integrate into existing teaching models and practices. This is because AI will not simply add to existing teaching modes and practices, but will fundamentally transform teaching and learning. Drawing on recent literature and research into in AI and higher education, this article explores possible future implications for social work education. We identify the transformative and disruptive potential of AI in higher education, and consider how this intersects with the ethical and relational side of social work as a profession. Implications for social work education are canvassed

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsw/bcab168

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Hodgson, D., Goldingay, S., Boddy, J., Nipperess, S., & Watts, L.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hodgson, David
Venue
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2021-08-02
Volume
52
Issue
4
Pages
1878-1895
ISSN
  • 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-263X
OpenAlex
W3189091635
Cited by
74
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
Keywords
artificial intelligence, social work education, higher education, pedagogy, digital skills, AI ethics, relational practice, disruptive technologies, future of teaching and learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review