Problematising Artificial Intelligence in Social Work Education: Challenges, Issues and Possibilities
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is the fourth industrial revolution, and in higher education it will fundamentally transform the work of academics and higher education administrators. AI will also have several implications for students, including a reconsideration of what sorts of skills and knowledge should be taught and developed in the academy to prepare students for digital working lives. As social work educators, we have begun to wonder what the implications of AI in the academy will have for social work education. For educators, there are implications for pedagogy that go well beyond the introduction of new digital tools that merely integrate into existing teaching models and practices. This is because AI will not simply add to existing teaching modes and practices, but will fundamentally transform teaching and learning. Drawing on recent literature and research into in AI and higher education, this article explores possible future implications for social work education. We identify the transformative and disruptive potential of AI in higher education, and consider how this intersects with the ethical and relational side of social work as a profession. Implications for social work education are canvassed
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242 · see citing works
The Ugly Truth About Ourselves and Our Robot Creations: The Problem of Bias and Social Inequity
Howard, A., & Borenstein, J. (2018) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-017-9975-2 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Preparing University Assessment for a World With AI: Tasks for Human Intelligence
Bearman, M., & Luckin, R. (2020) · The enabling power of assessment · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41956-1_5 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Singer, J. B., Báez, J. C., & Rios, J. A. (2023) · Journal of Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/10437797.2023.2189878 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Watts, K. J. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15101304 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hodgson, D., Goldingay, S., Boddy, J., Nipperess, S., & Watts, L.
- Affiliations
- Curtin University (AU)
- Deakin University (AU)
- Griffith University (AU)
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Hodgson, David
- Venue
- The British Journal of Social Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-08-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1878-1895
- ISSN
- 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-263X
- OpenAlex
- W3189091635
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 5.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, social work education, higher education, pedagogy, digital skills, AI ethics, relational practice, disruptive technologies, future of teaching and learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review