The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Social Workers’ Perceptions of the Effect of Interpersonal Factors on Older Adults’ Decision to Remain in Abusive Relationships
Abstract
Older adults who are abused by their offspring often find it difficult to cooperate with professionals to end the abuse. In these situations, social workers face an ethical dilemma between respecting the older adult’s right to autonomy and intervening in a paternalistic way to prevent harm. This qualitative study aimed to examine the effect of interpersonal factors on the decision-making ability of older adults who do not experience significant cognitive and mental decline and choose to remain in abusive relationships. Twenty-one social workers specialising in the field of aging participated in a semi-structured interview based on a vignette. The analysis was encoded inductively, informed by the principles of content analysis. Two themes emerged: (i) Older adults’ feelings towards their abusive adult children, including love and concern, shame and guilt and relationships with symbiotic characteristics; (ii) Older adults’ motivation to stay in the abusive relationships, based either on utilitarian motivation or on their fear of the abuser. The study’s findings can serve as a foundation for the development of a tool for evaluating the influence of abusive relationships on older adults’ decision-making ability, which considers not only their personal characteristics but also their interactions and relationships with their surroundings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 2
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Acierno, 2020, Relevance of perpetrator identity to reporting elder financial and emotional mistreatment, Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39, 221, 10.1177/0733464818771208 · DOI
- Azman, 2017, Application of the vignette technique in a qualitative paradigm, GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 17, 27, 10.17576/gema-2017-1704-03 · DOI
- Bergeron, 2006, Self-determination and elder abuse: Do we know enough?, Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 46, 81, 10.1300/J083v46n03_05 · DOI · Paper page
- Braun, 2020, Legal interventions to protect vulnerable adults: Can relational autonomy provide a new way forward?, Elder Law Review
- Braye, 2017, Autonomy and protection in self-neglect work: The ethical complexity of decision-making, Ethics and Social Welfare, 11, 320, 10.1080/17496535.2017.1290814 · DOI
- Chokkanathan, 2014, Elder abuse and barriers to help seeking in Chennai, India: A qualitative study, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 26, 60, 10.1080/08946566.2013.782786 · DOI
- Corbin, 2014, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
- Creswell, 2013, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Traditions
- Donovan, 2010, Elder abuse: Clinical, ethical, and legal considerations in social work practice, Clinical Social Work Journal, 38, 174, 10.1007/s10615-010-0269-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Doron, 2004, Time for policy: Legislative response to elder abuse and neglect in Israel, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, 16, 63, 10.1300/J084v16n04_04 · DOI
- Fraga Dominguez, 2021, Help-seeking behavior in victims of elder abuse: A systematic review, Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 22, 466, 10.1177/1524838019860616 · DOI
- Krumpal, 2013, Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review, Quality & Quantity, 47, 2025, 10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Lincoln, 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, 10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Maier, 1976, Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3, 10.1037/0096-3445.105.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Marshall, 1996, Sampling for qualitative research, Family Practice, 13, 522, 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 · DOI · Paper page
- Miles, 2015, Responding to adolescent to parent violence: Challenges for policy and practice, British Journal of Criminology, 55, 1076, 10.1093/bjc/azv095 · DOI
- Nedelsky, 1993, Reconceiving rights as relationship, Review of Constitutional Studies, 1, 1
- Norrie, 2016, The potential uses and abuses of a power of entry for social workers in England: A re-analysis of responses to a government consultation, The Journal of Adult Protection, 18, 256, 10.1108/JAP-04-2016-0009 · DOI
- Pritchard-Jones, 2016, The good, the bad, and the “vulnerable older adult, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 38, 51, 10.1080/09649069.2016.1145838 · DOI
- Roepke-Buehler, 2015, Association between depressive symptoms, multiple dimensions of depression, and elder abuse: A cross-sectional, population-based analysis of older adults in urban Chicago, Journal of Aging and Health, 27, 1003, 10.1177/0898264315571106 · DOI
- Shimshoni, 2022, Non-violent resistance and family accommodation: A trans-diagnostic solution to a highly prevalent problem, Family Process., 61, 43, 10.1111/famp.12706 · DOI
- Stevens, 2020, Practice perspectives and theoretical debates about social workers’ legal powers to protect adults, Journal of Social Work, 20, 3, 10.1177/1468017318794275 · DOI
- Storey, 2020, Risk factors for elder abuse and neglect: A review of the literature, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 50, 101339, 10.1016/j.avb.2019.101339 · DOI
- Vrantsidis, 2016, The Older Person’s Experience: Outcomes of Interventions into Elder Abuse
- Yan, 2015, Elder abuse and help-seeking behavior in elderly Chinese, Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 2683, 10.1177/0886260514553628 · DOI
- Yon, 2017, Elder abuse prevalence in community settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis, The Lancet Global Health, 5, e147, 10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30006-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Yunus, 2019, Consequences of elder abuse and neglect: A systematic review of observational studies, Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 20, 197, 10.1177/1524838017692798 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lev, S., Schindler, M., & Waksman, Y.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Lev, Sagit
- ORCID
- Lev, Sagit
- Venue
- The British Journal of Social Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2023-10-17
- ISSN
- 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-263X
- OpenAlex
- W4387730470
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Impact Centre for the Study of Ageism and Old Age
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Elder Abuse and Neglect
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
- Social Sciences › Life-span and Life-course Studies › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
- Keywords
- elder abuse, intergenerational abuse, older adults, abusive relationships, decision-making ability, social workers' perceptions, paternalism, ethical dilemmas, autonomy, symbiosis, utilitarian motivation, guilt and shame, aging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Workers’ Perceptions of the Effect of Interpersonal Factors on Older Adults’ Decision to Remain in Abusive Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bjsw/bcad226
- The paper
- Lev, S., Schindler, M., & Waksman, Y. (2023). Social Workers’ Perceptions of the Effect of Interpersonal Factors on Older Adults’ Decision to Remain in Abusive Relationships. The British Journal of Social Work. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcad226
