The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accounting for Ethical Difficulties in Social Welfare Work: Issues, Problems and Dilemmas
Open accessAbstract
This paper is a preliminary exploration of social welfare practitioners’ accounts of ‘ethically difficult situations’. It describes variations in the ethical vocabulary and form of these accounts. Analysis of practitioners’ own accounts (as opposed to ‘textbook’ cases) draws attention to the ways they construct events, actions and qualities of character as ethically significant and highlights the qualitative distinctiveness of ethical dilemmas, where seemingly irresolvable choices leave a residue of moral loss, regret or guilt.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4883 · Cited by 3,163
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dilemas de la inclusión y discapacidad en la educación superior
Pérez Castro, J. (2022) · Perfiles Educativos · doi:10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2022.175.60179 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Banks, S.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Banks, S.
- ORCID
- Banks, S.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-05-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1005-1022
- ISSN
- 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-263X
- OpenAlex
- W2163920429
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 4.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Leverhulme Trust
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Keywords
- ethical dilemmas, social welfare work, social work ethics, guilt, regret, character
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
