The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Three Planet Model: Towards an Understanding of Contradictions in Approaches to Women and Children's Safety in Contexts of Domestic Violence
Abstract
Despite the development of much positive work by to tackle domestic violence, frustrations are often voiced by social care and other professionals - and echoed in women's and children's experiences - that it can be difficult to ensure and sustain safe outcomes for women and children in circumstances of domestic violence. The article takes as its starting point these frustrations and difficulties, and provides an attempt at understanding some of the systemic problems practitioners may be facing that undermine the effectiveness of their practice. The article explores in particular some of the tensions and contradictions that are evident in professional discourses and practices across work with victims and perpetrators of domestic violence; child protection and safeguarding; and child contact. These three areas of work are especially difficult to bring together into a cohesive and co-ordinated approach because they are effectively on separate ‘planets’ - with their own separate histories, culture, laws, and populations (sets of professionals). The notion of separate ‘planets’ can also be understood in light of what Bourdieu (1989) would call the ‘habitus’ of groups, where the particular structures, orientations and approaches in the work of a professional group may create divides between their own everyday and common place professional assumptions and practices and those of other professional groups. Tackling the ‘three planet problem’, and dealing more effectively with domestic violence as it impacts on adults and children, requires both a unified approach across the separate ‘planet’ areas and acknowledgement of the processes of gendering that are situating women as culpable victims. It requires much closer and coherent practices across the three areas of work, with acknowledgement and understanding of professional assumptions and practices of different professional groups.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Male victims of DVA are disturbed (and avoid services) because of their perception that they can be treated as perpetrators, yet we know from both the female and male victim data that their perpetrators sometimes present as victims at various points [3, 31].”
Citations
Cites
Social Space and Symbolic Power
Bourdıeu, P. (1989) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202060 · Cited by 4,697
Miller, S. L., & Meloy, M. L. (2005) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801205277356 · Cited by 169
Making it through the Criminal Justice System: Attrition and Domestic Violence
Hester, M. (2006) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746405002769 · Cited by 131
Self-citationLapierre, S. (2009) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp080 · Cited by 130
Violent Men as Good-enough Fathers?
Eriksson, M., & Hester, M. (2001) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/10778010122182730 · Cited by 97
Self-citationReducing Repeat Victimization Among High-Risk Victims of Domestic Violence
Robinson, A. L. (2006) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801206291477 · Cited by 94
Readiness to Change: Mother-Child Relationship and Domestic Violence Intervention
Humphreys, C., Thiara, R. K., & Skamballis, A. (2010) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq046 · Cited by 88
Stanley, N., Miller, P., Foster, H. R., & Thomson, G. (2010) · The British Journal of Social Work · doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcq071 · Cited by 74
Chronic child abuse and domestic violence: children and families with long‐term and complex needs
Devaney, J. (2008) · Child & Family Social Work · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00559.x · Cited by 65
Methodology, feminism and gender violence
Corcoran, M. S. (2013) · Willan eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781843926689-7 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2010, British Journal of Social Work, 40, 166
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guedes, A. C., Bott, S., García‐Moreno, C., & Colombini, M. (2016) · Global Health Action · doi:10.3402/gha.v9.31516 · Cited by 423
Beyond “Witnessing”: Children’s Experiences of Coercive Control in Domestic Violence and Abuse
Callaghan, J. E. M., Alexander, J. H., Sixsmith, J., & Fellin, L. C. (2018) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260515618946 · Cited by 328
Huntley, A. L., Potter, L., Williamson, E., Malpass, A., Szilassy, E., & Feder, G. (2019) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021960 · Cited by 194
Naming and Defining ‘Domestic Violence’: Lessons from Research with Violent Men
Kelly, L., & Westmarland, N. (2016) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.2015.52 · Cited by 121
Bidarra, Z. S., Lessard, G., & Dumont, A. (2016) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.03.007 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Hester, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hester, M.
- ORCID
- Hester, M.
- Venue
- British Journal of Social Work
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 837-853
- ISSN
- 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-263X
- OpenAlex
- W2165580166
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 9.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
- Keywords
- domestic violence, women's safety, child safety, child protection, safeguarding, child contact, victim support, professional practice, interprofessional tensions, habitus, social care workers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review