The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries
Abstract
In developed countries where maternal death is rare, the factors surrounding the death are often peculiar to the event and are not generalizable, making analysis of maternal deaths less useful. Near misses are defined as pregnant women with severe life-threatening conditions who nearly die but, with good luck or good care, survive. Incorporation of near misses into maternal death enquiries would strengthen these audits by allowing for more rapid reporting, more robust conclusions, comparisons to be made with maternal deaths, reinforcing lessons learnt, establishing requirements for intensive care and calculating comparative indices. The survival of a pregnant woman is dependent on the disease, her basic health, the health care facilities and personnel of the health care system. The criteria currently used to identify a near miss vary greatly. However, areas with similar health care facilities, medical records and personnel should be able to agree on suitable criteria, making their incorporation into maternal death enquiries feasible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Women's Reports of Severe (Near‐miss) Obstetric Complications in Benin
Filippi, V., Ronsmans, C., Gandaho, T., Graham, W., Alihonou, E., & Santos, P. (2000) · Studies in Family Planning · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4465.2000.00309.x · Cited by 97
Cited by
Maternal near miss – towards a standard tool for monitoring quality of maternal health care
Say, L., Souza, J. P., & Pattinson, R. C. (2009) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.01.007 · Cited by 961
Self-citationSay, L., Pattinson, R. C., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2004) · Reproductive Health · doi:10.1186/1742-4755-1-3 · Cited by 468
Self-citationPrevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage
Al‐Zirqi, I., Vangen, S., Forsen, L., & Stray‐Pedersen, B. (2008) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01859.x · Cited by 441
Peripartum hysterectomy in the UK: management and outcomes of the associated haemorrhage
Knight, M., & UKOSS (2007) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01507.x · Cited by 336
Assessing quality of care provided by Indonesian village midwives with a confidential enquiry
D’Ambruoso, L., Achadi, E., Adisasmita, A., Izati, Y., Makowiecka, K., & Hussein, J. (2009) · Midwifery · doi:10.1016/j.midw.2007.08.008 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Pattinson, R., & Hall, M.
- Venue
- British Medical Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-243
- ISSN
- 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8391
- OpenAlex
- W2140653531
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bmb/ldg007
- The paper
- Pattinson, R., & Hall, M. (2003). Near misses: a useful adjunct to maternal death enquiries. British Medical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.