The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Obstructed labour
Open accessAbstract
Obstructed labour is an important cause of maternal deaths in communities in which undernutrition in childhood is common resulting in small pelves in women, and in which there is no easy access to functioning health facilities with the capability of carrying out operative deliveries. Obstructed labour also causes significant maternal morbidity in the short term (notably infection) and long term (notably obstetric fistulas). Fetal death from asphyxia is also common. There are differences in the behaviour of the uterus during obstructed labour, depending on whether the woman has delivered previously. The pattern in primigravid women (typically diminishing contractility with risk of infection and fistula) may result from tissue acidosis, whereas in parous women, contractility may be maintained with the risk of uterine rupture. Ultimately, tackling the problem of obstructed labour will require universal adequate nutritional intake from childhood and the ability to access adequately equipped and staffed clinical facilities when problems arise in labour. These seem still rather distant aspirations. In the meantime, strategies should be implemented to encourage early recognition of prolonged labour and appropriate clinical responses. The sequelae of obstructed labour can be an enormous source of human misery and the prevention of obstetric fistulas, and skilled treatment if they do occur, are important priorities in regions where obstructed labour is still common.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Obstetric vesicovaginal fistula as an international public-health problem
Wall, L. L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69476-2 · Cited by 542
Global operating theatre distribution and pulse oximetry supply: an estimation from reported data
Funk, L. M., Weiser, T. G., Berry, W. R., Lipsitz, S. R., Merry, A. F., Enright, A. C., Wilson, I. H., Dziekan, G., & Gawande, A. A. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60392-3 · Cited by 397
Justus Hofmeyr, G., Say, L., & Metin Gülmezoglu, A. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00725.x · Cited by 379
Mselle, L. T., Kohi, T. W., Mvungi, A., Evjen-Olsen, B., & Moland, K. M. (2011) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-11-75 · Cited by 85
Mehari, H., Haile, F., Habtezghi, S., Mulugeta, Y., Abraham, G., Berhe, M., & Abdu, N. (2023) · International Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.2147/ijwh.s389939 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Neilson, J., Lavender, T., Quenby, S., & Wray, S.
- Venue
- British Medical Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 191-204
- ISSN
- 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8391
- OpenAlex
- W2257439282
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obstructed labour. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bmb/ldg018
- The paper
- Neilson, J., Lavender, T., Quenby, S., & Wray, S. (2003). Obstructed labour. British Medical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.