The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The impact of environmental pollution on congenital anomalies
Abstract
Major congenital anomalies are diagnosed in 2-4% of births. In this paper we review epidemiological studies that have specifically looked at congenital anomalies as a possible outcome of community exposure to chemical exposures associated with environmental pollution. These include studies of drinking water contaminants (heavy metals and nitrates, chlorinated and aromatic solvents, and chlorination by-products), residence near waste disposal sites and contaminated land, pesticide exposure in agricultural areas, air pollution and industrial pollution sources, food contamination, and disasters involving accidental, negligent or deliberate chemical releases of great magnitude. We conclude that there are relatively few environmental pollution exposures for which we can draw strong conclusions about the potential to cause congenital anomalies and, if so, the chemical constituents implicated, to provide an evidence base for public health and clinical practice. A precautionary approach should be adopted at both community and individual level. In order to prevent congenital anomalies, one must reduce exposure to potential teratogens before pregnancy is recognized (i.e. preconceptionally and in the first few weeks of pregnancy). It is a challenge to develop effective strategies for preconceptional care within the primary care framework. Prenatal service providers and counsellors need to be aware of the uncertainties regarding environmental pollution when addressing parental concerns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?
Hill, A. B. (1965) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/003591576505800503 · Cited by 6,974
Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Toledano, M. B., Eaton, N. E., Fawell, J., & Elliott, P. (2000) · Occupational and Environmental Medicine · doi:10.1136/oem.57.2.73 · Cited by 591
Male Reproductive Health and Environmental Xenoestrogens
Toppari, J., Larsen, J. C., Christiansen, P., Giwercman, A., Grandjean, P., Guillette, L. J., Jegou, B., Jensen, T. K., Jouannet, P., Keiding, N., et al. (1996) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.2307/3432709 · Cited by 348
Drinking water contaminants and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a review.
Bove, F., Shim, Y., & Zeitz, P. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.02110s161 · Cited by 315
Cited by
Ren, A., Qiu, X., Jin, L., Ma, J., Li, Z., Zhang, L., Zhu, H., Finnell, R. H., & Zhu, T. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1105209108 · Cited by 300
Porta, D., Milani, S., Lazzarino, A. I., Perucci, C. A., & Forastiere, F. (2009) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-8-60 · Cited by 281
Mattiello, A., Chiodini, P., Bianco, E., Forgione, N., Flammia, I., Gallo, C., Pizzuti, R., & Panico, S. (2013) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s00038-013-0496-8 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Dolk, H., & Vrijheid, M.
- Venue
- British Medical Bulletin
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-12-01
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-45
- ISSN
- 0007-1420 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-8391
- OpenAlex
- W2109010460
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of environmental pollution on congenital anomalies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bmb/ldg024
- The paper
- Dolk, H., & Vrijheid, M. (2003). The impact of environmental pollution on congenital anomalies. British Medical Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldg024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.