Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ACQUISITION OF A MOTOR SKILL AFTER LEFT-HEMISPHERE DAMAGE

KIMURA, DOREEN·1977·Brain

Abstract

Specialization of function in the left hemisphere of man, as compared with the right, was studied with special reference to the nature of the impairments seen after left-hemisphere damage. Patients with unilateral lesions of the left or the right hemisphere were compared in the acquisition and subsequent performance of a manual skill requiring several hand movements. Patients with left-hemisphere damage were further subdivided into aphasic and non-aphasic groups. Patients with left-hemisphere damage were further subdivided into aphasic and non-aphasic groups. Patients with left-hemisphere damage, whether aphasic or not, were impaired in the acquisition of the task, relative to patients with right hemisphere damage, although aphasics were most severely impaired. Analysis of the errors made during acquisition indicated that perseverative errors and unique errors (unrelated movements) differentiated the left and right groups, but that sequencing errors did not. It was concluded that a major function of the left hemisphere is the control of changes in limb or articulatory posture, and that its complex verbal and praxic functions are derived from such control.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/100.3.527

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
KIMURA, D.
Venue
Brain
Published
1977
Volume
100
Issue
3
Pages
527-542
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2105224293
Cited by
423
References
0
FWCI
13.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.