The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long Latency Event-Related Components of the Auditory Evoked Potential in Dementia
Open accessAbstract
Long-latency auditory evoked potentials were recorded from two groups of patients, with and without dementia, and were compared with those from a population of normal subjects ranging in age from 15 to 76 years. A sequence of tones of two different frequencies (1000 Hz and 2000 Hz) was presented and each patient was asked to count the occurrences of the rare (P = 0.15) tones in the sequence. Evoked potential waveforms were averaged separately for the rare and frequent tone. Of the various evoked potential components elicited by the tones, the P3 component (latency 300-500 ms) was found to be the most sensitive to aging in normal subjects. It was also the only component which could be used to differentiate between the demented patients and the normal subjects or non-demented patients. The non-demented patients did not differ from normal in any waveform measure. The magnitude of the latency change of the P3 component in dementia relative to normal was sufficiently large that it may provide a practical and objective measure of dementia in a clinical setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Augmenting mental chronometry: The P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., & Donchin, E. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.887923 · Cited by 1,714
Cited by
Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?
Donchin, E., & Coles, M. G. H. (1988) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00058027 · Cited by 3,585
Decreased response to novel stimuli after prefrontal lesions in man
Knight, R. T. (1984) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(84)90016-9 · Cited by 828
Pfefferbaum, A., Wenegrat, B. G., Ford, J. M., Roth, W. T., & Kopell, B. S. (1984) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section · doi:10.1016/0168-5597(84)90027-3 · Cited by 573
The Functional Neuroanatomy of Target Detection: An fMRI Study of Visual and Auditory Oddball Tasks
Linden, D. E. J. (1999) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/9.8.815 · Cited by 511
Episodic and semantic memory: an analysis in the EEG theta and alpha band
Klimesch, W., Schimke, H., & Schwaiger, J. (1994) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(94)90164-3 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodin, D. S., Squires, K. C., & Starr, A.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1978-12-01
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635-648
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2155101755
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long Latency Event-Related Components of the Auditory Evoked Potential in Dementia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/101.4.635
- The paper
- Goodin, D. S., Squires, K. C., & Starr, A. (1978). Long Latency Event-Related Components of the Auditory Evoked Potential in Dementia. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/101.4.635
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.