CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 589Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceTactile and Sensory InteractionsNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SUBJECTIVE REFERRAL OF THE TIMING FOR A CONSCIOUS SENSORY EXPERIENCE: A FUNCTIONAL ROLE FOR THE SOMATOSENSORY SPECIFIC PROJECTION SYSTEM IN MAN

LIBET, BENJAMIN, WRIGHT, EL WOOD W., FEINSTEIN, BERTRAM, PEARL, DENNIS K.·1979·Brain
DOI 10.1093/brain/102.1.193
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Subjective experience of a peripherally-induced sensation is found to appear without the substantial delay found for the experience of a cortically-induced sensation. To explain this finding, in relation to the putative delay of up to about 500 ms for achieving the "neuronal adequacy" required to elicit the peripherally-induced experience, a modified hypothesis is proposed: for a peripheral sensory input, (a) the primary evoked response of sensory cortex to the specific projection (lemniscal) input is associated with a process that can serve as a 'time-marker'; and (b), after delayed neuronal adequacy is achieved, there is a subjective referral of the sensory experience backwards in time so as to coincide with this initial 'time-marker'. A crucial prediction of the hypothesis was experimentally tested in human subjects using suitably implanted electrodes, and the results provide specific support for the proposal. In this, the test stimuli to medial lemniscus (LM) and to surface of somatosensory cortex (C) were arranged so that a minimum train duration of 200 ms or more was required to produce any conscious sensory experience in each case. Each such cerebral stimulus could be temporally coupled with a peripheral one (usually skin, S) that required relatively negligible stimulus duration to produce a sensation. The sensory experiences induced by LM stimuli were found to be subjectively timed as if there were no delay relative to those for S, that is, as if the subjective experience for LM was referred to the onset rather than to the end of the required stimulus duration of 200 ms or more. On the other hand, sensory experiences induced by the C stimuli, which did not excite specific projection afferents, appeared to be subjectively timed with a substantial delay relative to those for S, that is, as if the time of the subjective experience coincided roughly with the end of the minimum duration required by the C stimuli. The newly proposed functional role for the specific projection system in temporal referral would be additional to its known role in spatial referral and discrimination. A temporal discrepancy between corresponding mental and physical events, i.e., between the timing of a subjective sensory experience and the time at which the state of 'neuronal adequacy' for giving rise to this experience is achieved, would introduce a novel experimentally-based feature into the concept of psychophysiological parallelism in the mind-brain relationship.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/102.1.193

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–588 of 588

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
LIBET, B., WRIGHT, E. W. W., FEINSTEIN, B., & PEARL, D. K.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
ORCID
PEARL, DENNIS K.
Venue
Brain
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1979
Volume
102
Issue
1
Pages
193-224
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
DOI
10.1093/brain/102.1.193
OpenAlex
W2614717744
Cited by
589
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
38.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
medial lemniscus, somatosensory cortex, mind-brain relationship
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Consciousness, Dominance, Cerebral, Electric Stimulation, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Neurons, Reaction Time, Sensation, Skin, Somatosensory Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review