The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COURSE AND PROGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSESSED BY THE COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING OF 349 PATIENTS
Abstract
The information of 349 cases of multiple sclerosis, seen in a neurological department over a twenty-year period and followed up for a mean of nine years, was analysed by computerized data processing. The mean age at onset was 30.0 years for the remittent onset types (82 per cent cases) and 37.3 years for the progressive onset types (18 per cent cases). During the course of the disease the age of the 'pure relapse' stage was 29.2 years, of the relapse with sequelae stage 33.9 years and of the progressive phase 38.0 years. The interval between the first two relapses in the remittent-progressive type was important, the shorter the interval the sooner the progressive phase occurred. The relapses tended to increase in frequency before the progressive phase started. Using an actuarial graph, 50 per cent of cases could be expected to be moderately disabled (still ambulatory) in six years, and severely disabled (not ambulatory) in eighteen years and dead in thirty years. Combining a disability score and the duration of the disease prognostic factors could be studied. A late onset of the disease, a short interval between the first two relapses and the occurrence of the progressive phase were associated with a poor outcome. Sex of patient, the symptomatology of the initial relapses, and the constituents of the CSF had no prognostic value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rate of Pregnancy-Related Relapse in Multiple Sclerosis
Confavreux, C., Hutchinson, M., Hours, M. M., Cortinovis-Tourniaire, P., & Moreau, T. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199807303390501 · Cited by 1,559
Self-citationThe natural history of multiple sclerosis:a geographically based study
Cottrell, D. A., Kremenchutzky, M., Rice, G. P. A., Koopman, W. J., Hader, W., Baskerville, J., & Ebers, G. C. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.4.625 · Cited by 1,163
Gender differences in autoimmune disease
Ngo, S. T., Steyn, F. J., & McCombe, P. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2014.04.004 · Cited by 1,074
A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis
Brex, P. A., Ciccarelli, O., O'Riordan, J. I., Sailer, M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011341 · Cited by 861
Multiple sclerosis: clinical aspects
Oh, J., Vidal-Jordana, A., & Montalban, X. (2018) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000000622 · Cited by 620
Metadata
- Authors
- CONFAVREUX, C., AIMARD, G., & DEVIC, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1980
- Volume
- 103
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-300
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2128514970
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COURSE AND PROGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSESSED BY THE COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING OF 349 PATIENTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/103.2.281
- The paper
- CONFAVREUX, C., AIMARD, G., & DEVIC, M. (1980). COURSE AND PROGNOSIS OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS ASSESSED BY THE COMPUTERIZED DATA PROCESSING OF 349 PATIENTS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/103.2.281
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.