PROCESSING OF SEMANTIC ANOMALY BY RIGHT AND LEFT HEMISPHERES OF COMMISSUROTOMY PATIENTS: EVIDENCE FROM EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS
Abstract
The ability of 5 commissurotomized patients to appreciate semantic anomalies presented to their right and left hemispheres was tested using both electrophysiological and behavioural measures. In all cases, the patients heard sentence fragments that were completed either by semantically congruous or incongruous words briefly flashed to the left visual field, right visual field or to both fields simultaneously. A dissociation between behavioural and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures was observed. All 5 patients were able to indicate by a pointing response with greater than chance accuracy whether the terminal word of a sentence made sense (i.e., appropriate for the context) or was nonsensical. This was true regardless of the hemisphere receiving the terminal word. Likewise, all the patients responded to right visual field anomalies with a cerebral potential (N400) that was typically elicited by such words in control subjects. In contrast, only those 2 patients who developed an overt speech capability under the control of the right hemisphere produced N400 waves in response to left visual field anomalies. These findings were interpreted as suggesting possible relationships within language generation and semantic priming.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several years ago, prior to displaying any capacity for right hemisphere speech, J.W.'s right hemisphere did not elicit an N400 event-related potential to semantically incongruent stimuli.
“Several years ago, prior to displaying any capacity for right hemisphere speech, J.W.'s right hemisphere did not elicit an N400 event-related potential to semantically incongruent stimuli (Kutas et al., 1988).”
From Collaboration between the hemispheres of a callosotomy patient: Emerging right hemisphere speech and the left hemisphere interpreter (1996) · cites this paper as Kutas et al., 1988
The presence of the event-related potential N400 wave has been correlated with the capacity for speech in other callosotomy patients.
“It should be noted, in this regard, that the presence of the event-related potential N400 wave has been correlated with the capacity for speech in other callosotomy patients (Kutas et al., 1988).”
From Collaboration between the hemispheres of a callosotomy patient: Emerging right hemisphere speech and the left hemisphere interpreter (1996) · cites this paper as Kutas et al., 1988
Cites
Profiles of right hemisphere language and speech following brain bisection
Gazzaniga, M. S., Smylie, C. S., Baynes, K., Hirst, W., & McCleary, C. (1984) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(84)90090-7 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationSpeech without conscious awareness
Gazzaniga, M. S., Holtzman, J. D., & Smylie, C. S. (1987) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.37.4.682 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gazzaniga, M. S. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.7.1293 · Cited by 1,414 · see citing works
Self-citationBentin, S., Mouchetant-Rostaing, Y., Giard, M. H., Echallier, J. F., & Pernier, J. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563373 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Cortical Language Activation in Stroke Patients Recovering From Aphasia With Functional MRI
Cao, Y., Vikingstad, E. M., George, K. P., Johnson, A. F., & Welch, K. M. A. (1999) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.30.11.2331 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
An ERP study of second language learning after childhood: effects of proficiency.
Ojima, S., Nakata, H., & Kakigi, R. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929055002436 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Principles of human brain organization derived from split-brain studies
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1995) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(95)90280-5 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Self-citationOrganization of the human brain.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2672334 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Self-citationRight-hemisphere memory superiority: studies of a split-brain patient
Metcalfe, J., Funnell, M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1995) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00325.x · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationGazzaniga, M. S., Eliassen, J. C., Nisenson, L., Wessinger, C. M., Fendrich, R., & Baynes, K. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.4.1255 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- KUTAS, M., HILLYARD, S. A., & GAZZANIGA, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 553-576
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2120687313
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 3.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 00322)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS17778)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD-22614)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- semantic anomalies, hemispheric lateralization, right hemisphere language, left hemisphere language, N400, event-related potentials, semantic priming, sentence comprehension, visual field presentation, pointing responses, language generation
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Behavior, Brain, Epilepsy, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Language, Male, Seizures, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review