The DOI matches its Crossref record.
OPTIC ATAXIA: A SPECIFIC DISRUPTION IN VISUOMOTOR MECHANISMS: I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE DEFICIT IN REACHING FOR OBJECTS
Abstract
Visually directed arm movements have been studied by film recordings in 10 patients with optic ataxia resulting from unilateral lesions of the parietal region, in 3 cases on the right and in 7 on the left. Half of the patients also underwent visuospatial perceptive tests. The results indicate the following. (1) Optic ataxia is a specific visuomotor disorder, independent of visual space misperception. (2) The proximal and the distal components of the movements are equally affected as shown in reaching and hand orientation tasks. (3) The percentages of spatial and orientation errors quantified, respectively, in these two situations show a different distribution across the different hand-field combinations according to the side of the lesion: whereas the right-damaged patients show a deficit essentially related to a field effect, the left-damaged patients show in addition to the latter an impairment related to a hand effect. These findings suggest that the 2 types of visuomotor mechanisms responsible for the proximal and distal components of visually-directed arm movements are controlled by the parietal cortex and that there should exist a hemisphere asymmetry in the functional organization of these mechanisms. (4) Reconstruction of the lesions drawn from CT scans in 8 of the patients shows a salient and constant involvement of the posterior parietal cortex, always including the intraparietal sulcus and either the superior part of the inferior parietal lobule or more often various parts of the superior parietal lobule. The weak co-occurrence of optic ataxia and hemispatial neglect, and their different lesion sites, indicate a double dissociation between these two symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Separate visual pathways for perception and action
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 · Cited by 6,519
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2002) · Vision and Mind · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7111.003.0023 · Cited by 3,331
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · Cited by 2,212
Milner, A. D., & Goodale, M. A. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.005 · Cited by 1,514
Metadata
- Authors
- PERENIN, M.-T., & VIGHETTO, A.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 643-674
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1975981294
- Cited by
- 966
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPTIC ATAXIA: A SPECIFIC DISRUPTION IN VISUOMOTOR MECHANISMS: I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE DEFICIT IN REACHING FOR OBJECTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/111.3.643
- The paper
- PERENIN, M.-T., & VIGHETTO, A. (1988). OPTIC ATAXIA: A SPECIFIC DISRUPTION IN VISUOMOTOR MECHANISMS: I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE DEFICIT IN REACHING FOR OBJECTS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/111.3.643
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.