Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 966

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OPTIC ATAXIA: A SPECIFIC DISRUPTION IN VISUOMOTOR MECHANISMS: I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE DEFICIT IN REACHING FOR OBJECTS

PERENIN, M.-T., VIGHETTO, A.·1988·Brain

Abstract

Visually directed arm movements have been studied by film recordings in 10 patients with optic ataxia resulting from unilateral lesions of the parietal region, in 3 cases on the right and in 7 on the left. Half of the patients also underwent visuospatial perceptive tests. The results indicate the following. (1) Optic ataxia is a specific visuomotor disorder, independent of visual space misperception. (2) The proximal and the distal components of the movements are equally affected as shown in reaching and hand orientation tasks. (3) The percentages of spatial and orientation errors quantified, respectively, in these two situations show a different distribution across the different hand-field combinations according to the side of the lesion: whereas the right-damaged patients show a deficit essentially related to a field effect, the left-damaged patients show in addition to the latter an impairment related to a hand effect. These findings suggest that the 2 types of visuomotor mechanisms responsible for the proximal and distal components of visually-directed arm movements are controlled by the parietal cortex and that there should exist a hemisphere asymmetry in the functional organization of these mechanisms. (4) Reconstruction of the lesions drawn from CT scans in 8 of the patients shows a salient and constant involvement of the posterior parietal cortex, always including the intraparietal sulcus and either the superior part of the inferior parietal lobule or more often various parts of the superior parietal lobule. The weak co-occurrence of optic ataxia and hemispatial neglect, and their different lesion sites, indicate a double dissociation between these two symptoms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/111.3.643

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 966

Metadata

Authors
PERENIN, M.-T., & VIGHETTO, A.
Venue
Brain
Published
1988
Volume
111
Issue
3
Pages
643-674
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1975981294
Cited by
966
References
0
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPTIC ATAXIA: A SPECIFIC DISRUPTION IN VISUOMOTOR MECHANISMS: I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE DEFICIT IN REACHING FOR OBJECTS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/111.3.643
The paper
PERENIN, M.-T., & VIGHETTO, A. (1988). OPTIC ATAXIA: A SPECIFIC DISRUPTION IN VISUOMOTOR MECHANISMS: I. DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF THE DEFICIT IN REACHING FOR OBJECTS. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/111.3.643

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.