Cited by 219Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesBarrier Structure and Function StudiesPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Duration and selectivity of blood–brain barrier breakdown in chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis studied by gadolinium-DTPA and protein markers

HAWKINS, C. P., MUNRO, P. M. G., MACKENZIE, F., KESSELRING, J., TOFTS, P. S., BOULAY, E. P. G. H. DU, LANDON, D. N., McDONALD, W. I.·1990·Brain

Abstract

Gadolinium-DTPA (Gd-DTPA) enhancement seen with magnetic resonance imaging in chronic relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (CREAE) corresponded with sites of blood-brain barrier breakdown judged by traditional markers in areas of inflammatory demyelination. Duration of Gd-DTPA leakage for individual lesions in CREAE varied from 5 days to more than 5 wks. By contrast, in acute EAE leakage was of shorter duration (always less than 5 days). Selective enhancement was observed in CREAE lesions using Gd-protein markers. Gd-albumin enhancement was not always seen in areas of leakage of the smaller molecular weight compound Gd-DTPA. The addition of immunoglobulin to the gadolinium complex led to enhancement of lesions not seen with Gd-albumin alone. From the similarities between the histology and the patterns of Gd-enhancement in CREAE and multiple sclerosis, it is probable that Gd-enhancement reflects active inflammation (with or without demyelination) in the human disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/113.2.365

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aside from a relationship between Gd enhancement and inflammation, conventional MRI techniques do not distinguish other histopathological substrates of MS.

    “Aside from a relationship between Gd enhancement and inflammation (Hawkins et al., 1990; Katz et al., 1993), however, such conventional MRI (cMRI) techniques do not distinguish other histopathological substrates of MS (Moore, 2003).”

    From Diffusion tensor imaging of post mortem multiple sclerosis brain (2007) · cites this paper as Hawkins et al., 1990

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HAWKINS, C. P., MUNRO, P. M. G., MACKENZIE, F., KESSELRING, J., TOFTS, P. S., BOULAY, E. P. G. H. D., LANDON, D. N., & McDONALD, W. I.
Affiliations
National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
Corresponding author
McDONALD, W. I.
Venue
Brain
Published
1990
Volume
113
Issue
2
Pages
365-378
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1973786451
Cited by
219
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
16.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
blood-brain barrier disruption, Gd-DTPA, MRI contrast enhancement, demyelination, inflammation, multiple sclerosis
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood-Brain Barrier, Chronic Disease, Contrast Media, Pentetic Acid, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Guinea Pigs, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Microscopy, Electron, Organometallic Compounds, Proteins, Recurrence, Time Factors, Biomarkers, Gadolinium DTPA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review