The DOI matches its Crossref record.
VOLUNTARY ACTIVATION OF HUMAN MOTOR AXONS IN THE ABSENCE OF MUSCLE AFFERENT FEEDBACK: THE CONTROL OF THE DEAFFERENTED HAND
Abstract
The ability to activate human motoneurons supplying individual intrinsic muscles of the hand was examined during acute deafferentation of the muscles. Tungsten microelectrodes were inserted percutaneously into motor fascicles of the ulnar nerve of 5 subjects, which was then blocked distally with local anaesthetic. In 4 subjects unitary action potentials were recorded from 16 motor axons, which were identified with respect to their target muscles. In the complete absence of muscle afferent feedback, subjects could voluntarily recruit motoneurons, grade their discharge and sustain a constant level of activity. Significant facilitation of motor efforts was provided by cutaneous feedback from the digits via the median nerve. During attempted maximal voluntary efforts the mean discharge frequencies of single motor axons were significantly lower than those of normally-innervated motor units. This finding suggests that peripheral afferents have a net facilitatory influence on motoneurons. However, during prolonged (20-30 s) maximal voluntary efforts the deafferented motoneurons did not display the progressive decline in discharge frequency shown by normally-innervated motor units during contractile fatigue, a finding consistent with two possible explanations: disfacilitation or reflex inhibition of the motoneuron pool by peripheral afferents. The results also indicate that the otherwise intact nervous system can perform some simple motor tasks with no proprioceptive input other than knowledge of the motor commands. Other factors may contribute to the poor motor performance reported for patients with severe sensory deficits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Spasticity and muscle contracture following stroke
O'Dwyer, N. J., Ada, L., & Neilson, P. D. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.5.1737 · Cited by 616
Does the nervous system use equilibrium-point control to guide single and multiple joint movements?
Bizzi, E., Hogan, N., Mussa-Ivaldi, F. A., & Giszter, S. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00072538 · Cited by 465
Effects of aging on human skeletal muscle after immobilization and retraining
Suetta, C., Hvid, L. G., Justesen, L., Christensen, U., Neergaard, K., Simonsen, L., Ortenblad, N., Magnusson, S. P., Kjaer, M., & Aagaard, P. (2009) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00290.2009 · Cited by 400
Cerebral perturbations provoked by prolonged exercise
Nybo, L., & Secher, N. H. (2004) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.005 · Cited by 398
Does the nervous system depend on kinesthetic information to control natural limb movements?
Gandevia, S. C., & Burke, D. (1992) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0007254x · Cited by 359
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- GANDEVIA, S. C., MACEFIELD, G., BURKE, D., & MCKENZIE, D. K.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1563-1581
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2045998523
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: VOLUNTARY ACTIVATION OF HUMAN MOTOR AXONS IN THE ABSENCE OF MUSCLE AFFERENT FEEDBACK: THE CONTROL OF THE DEAFFERENTED HAND. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/113.5.1563
- The paper
- GANDEVIA, S. C., MACEFIELD, G., BURKE, D., & MCKENZIE, D. K. (1990). VOLUNTARY ACTIVATION OF HUMAN MOTOR AXONS IN THE ABSENCE OF MUSCLE AFFERENT FEEDBACK: THE CONTROL OF THE DEAFFERENTED HAND. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/113.5.1563
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.