The DOI matches its Crossref record.
CONCEPTUAL APRAXIA IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE
Abstract
Theoretical models of praxis have two major components, a praxis conceptual system that includes knowledge of tool use and mechanical knowledge and a praxis production system that includes the information needed to program skilled motor acts. Because patients with Alzheimer's disease may have an impairment of the central conceptual system, we wanted to learn if they had a conceptual apraxia by testing their knowledge of the type of actions associated with tool use, their ability to associate tools with objects that receive their action, their ability to understand the mechanical nature of problems and the mechanical advantages tools may afford. We studied 32 subjects with probable Alzheimer's disease and 32 controls by examining tool-action relationships and tool-object associations. We tested mechanical knowledge by having subjects select alternative tools and solve mechanical puzzles by developing new tools. The Alzheimer's group was subdivided into four groups based on the presence or absence of ideomotor apraxia and a lexical-semantic deficit. Results indicated that each of the four Alzheimer's groups differed from normal controls on at least some measures of conceptual apraxia, suggesting that Alzheimer's patients do have a disturbance of the praxis conceptual system and that impairment of this system is not directly related to language impairment or ideomotor apraxia.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leiguarda, R. C., & Marsden, C. D. (2000) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/123.5.860 · Cited by 382
Semantic knowledge in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease
Adlam, A.-L. R., Bozeat, S., Arnold, R., Watson, P., & Hodges, J. R. (2006) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70404-0 · Cited by 274
Lexical and Acoustic Speech Features Relating to Alzheimer Disease Pathology
Cho, S., Cousins, K. A. Q., Shellikeri, S., Ash, S., Irwin, D. J., Liberman, M. Y., Grossman, M., & Nevler, N. (2022) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000200581 · Cited by 51
Worthington, A. (2016) · NeuroRehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-161348 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- OCHIPA, C., ROTHI, L. J. G., & HEILMAN, K. M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1061-1071
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2082900220
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CONCEPTUAL APRAXIA IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/115.4.1061
- The paper
- OCHIPA, C., ROTHI, L. J. G., & HEILMAN, K. M. (1992). CONCEPTUAL APRAXIA IN ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/115.4.1061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.