The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy: A new syndrome?
Abstract
V.H., a 68-year-old right-handed woman, presented with a progressive deterioration in her ability to recognize faces of familiar people, including friends and relatives. Neuropsychological testing on two occasions separated by 9 months indicated no deterioration in general intellectual ability from estimates of her pre-morbid IQ (in the high average range), and little or no change in memory, language, perceptual or executive functioning. She is severely impaired on tests of face recognition and has shown some deterioration between testing occasions. In contrast, face perception skills, including emotional expression analysis, appear to be intact. Her knowledge of people from names was originally much better than from faces, but clearly declined on follow-up. This progression is discussed in the context of contemporary models of face processing: we suggest that her prosopagnosic deficit began as a modality-specific disorder which has progressed to a cross-modality loss of person-based semantic knowledge. In addition, she shows a striking dissociation between her ability to recognize faces and unique exemplars from other categories, such as buildings and flowers, which confirms the hypothesis that face processing is indeed special. Scanning by SPECT and MRI revealed selective hypoperfusion and atrophy, respectively, of the anterior part of the right temporal lobe. In recent years there have been a number of descriptions of progressive fluent aphasia resulting from atrophy of the left temporal lobe. This case appears to represent a corresponding degenerative process affecting the right temporal lobe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
Shallice, T. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511526817 · Cited by 4,072
Cited by
Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants
Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Hillis, A. E., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S. F., Ogar, J. M., Rohrer, J. D., Black, S., Boeve, B. F., et al. (2011) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31821103e6 · Cited by 5,141
Self-citationMcKeith, I. G., Galasko, D., Kosaka, K., Perry, E. K., Dickson, D. W., Hansen, L. A., Salmon, D. P., Lowe, J., Mirra, S. S., Byrne, E. J., et al. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.47.5.1113 · Cited by 3,960
The Enigmatic temporal pole: a review of findings on social and emotional processing
Olson, I. R., Plotzker, A., & Ezzyat, Y. (2007) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awm052 · Cited by 1,370
Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression
Calder, A. J., & Young, A. W. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1724 · Cited by 948
Semantic dementia: a unique clinicopathological syndrome
Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70266-1 · Cited by 772
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Evans, J. J., Heggs, A. J., Antoun, N., & Hodges, J. R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-13
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2098781390
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy: A new syndrome? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/118.1.1
- The paper
- Evans, J. J., Heggs, A. J., Antoun, N., & Hodges, J. R. (1995). Progressive prosopagnosia associated with selective right temporal lobe atrophy: A new syndrome? Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/118.1.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.