Cited by 53Metabolism and Genetic DisordersLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchHereditary Neurological Disorders

Neurophysiological abnormalities in adrenoleukodystrophy carriers. Evidence of different degrees of central nervous system involvement

Restuccia, D·1997·Brain

Abstract

We studied 19 women, heterozygous for adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) in whom the carrier status was demonstrated by abnormally high plasma levels of very-long-chain fatty acids. Clinical examination revealed slight neurological signs in two patients. Clear-cut neurological deficits in three, and it was fully normal in the remaining 14. All subjects underwent motor evoked potential (MEP) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) studies. Seventeen out of 19 subjects underwent brain MRI which demonstrated various degrees of abnormality in one asymptomatic and five symptomatic subjects; SEPs and MEPs revealed CNS involvement in 12 and 8 out of the 19 subjects, respectively. Symptomatic patients showed severe neurophysiological abnormalities, whereas milder but unequivocal EP abnormalities were found in seven of the 14 patients with normal clinical examination. Our data thus suggest CNS involvement in the majority of the ALD carriers, evident also in preclinical stages and progressively severe. The possibility of assessing different degrees of neurological involvement could be relevant for therapeutical purposes. Moreover, neurophysiological studies could provide the only objective marker of functional nervous system involvement, e.g. in order to monitor the efficacy of treatment, and in clinically and radiologically silent cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/120.7.1139

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Restuccia, D.
Affiliations
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
Corresponding author
Restuccia, D
Venue
Brain
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
120
Issue
7
Pages
1139-1148
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2120685190
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
Keywords
adrenoleukodystrophy, heterozygous females, very long chain fatty acids, motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, central nervous system involvement, brain MRI abnormalities, neurological deficit severity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adrenoleukodystrophy, Adult, Aged, Brain, Central Nervous System, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review