The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease increases supplementary motor area and prefrontal activation during performance of volitional movements an H2(15)O PET study
Abstract
Supplementary motor area and right dorsal prefrontal cortex activation in Parkinson's disease is selectively impaired during volitional limb movements. Since posteroventral pallidotomy improves motor performance in Parkinson's disease patients 'off' medication (i.e. off medication for 9-12 h), we hypothesized that it would also concomitantly increase supplementary motor area and dorsal prefrontal cortex activation. Six Parkinson's disease patients with a median total motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) of 52.5 (range 34-66) 'off' medication underwent unilateral right posteroventral pallidotomy. The patients had H2(15)O PET when 'off' medication before and 3-4 months after surgery. Each PET study comprised four to six measurements of regional cerebral blood flow either at rest or while performing regularly paced joystick movements in freely selected directions (forward, backward, left or right) using the left hand. Pre- and postoperative scans were performed in an identical manner and the associated levels of activation were compared using statistical parametric mapping. After pallidotomy, the median total motor UPDRS score 'off' medication decreased by 34.7% (P = 0.03) and mean response times of joystick movements following the pacing tones improved by 13.8% (P = 0.08). Relative increases in activation of the supplementary motor area and right dorsal prefrontal cortex were observed during joystick movements (P < 0.001). Decreased activation was seen in the region of the right pallidum (P = 0.001). We conclude that pallidotomy reduces pallidal inhibition of thalamocortical circuits and reverses, at least partially, the impairment of supplementary motor area and dorsal prefrontal cortex activation associated with Parkinson's disease.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Apathy and the Functional Anatomy of the Prefrontal Cortex–Basal Ganglia Circuits
Levy, R., & Dubois, B. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj043 · Cited by 1,285
Lang, A. E., & Lozano, A. M. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199810153391607 · Cited by 1,201
Pathophysiology of bradykinesia in Parkinson's disease
Berardelli, A. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.11.2131 · Cited by 906
Alexander, G. E. (2004) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2004.6.3/galexander · Cited by 523
Rehabilitation of brain damage: Brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery.
Robertson, I. H., & Murre, J. M. J. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.544 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Samuel, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-08-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1301-1313
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2125211084
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease increases supplementary motor area and prefrontal activation during performance of volitional movements an H2(15)O PET study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/120.8.1301
- The paper
- Samuel, M. (1997). Pallidotomy in Parkinson's disease increases supplementary motor area and prefrontal activation during performance of volitional movements an H2(15)O PET study. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/120.8.1301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.