The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Neurological abnormalities in familial and sporadic schizophrenia
Abstract
Neurological assessment was carried out on patients with schizophrenia from multiply and singly affected families, their relatives, and a normal control group (214 subjects). A systematic examination was used in which abnormal signs were divided into 'primary' and 'integrative' signs. Primary signs were elicited by a standard clinical neurological examination and included signs of focal damage to nuclei and tracts, whilst integrative signs were selected as reflecting distributed brain function. The assessments were carried out to test the hypotheses that (i) neurological abnormalities are present in schizophrenia, (ii) the pattern of abnormality is different in familial and sporadic schizophrenic subjects, and (iii) the well relatives of familial (but not sporadic) schizophrenic subjects will show neurological abnormalities. An excess of primary signs compared with the controls was demonstrated in the sporadic schizophrenic group only. Both the familial schizophrenics and their first-degree relatives (but not their sporadic counterparts) showed an increase in integrative signs. The results support the existence of different mechanisms of underlying brain dysfunction in familial and sporadic schizophrenia.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mild motor abnormalities ('neurological soft signs') can also be found in PPD, particularly in schizophrenia.
“mild motor abnormalities ('neurological soft signs') can also be found in PPD, particularly in schizophrenia (Griffiths et al. , 1998).”
From Recommendations to distinguish behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia from psychiatric disorders (2020) · cites this paper as Griffiths et al., 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ducharme, S., Dols, A., Laforce, R., Devenney, E., Kumfor, F., van den Stock, J., Dallaire-Théroux, C., Seelaar, H., Gossink, F., Vijverberg, E., et al. (2020) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa018 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffiths, T.
- Affiliations
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, T.
- ORCID
- Griffiths, T.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-02-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 191-203
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2061787394
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Wellcome Trust
- Guarantors of Brain
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, neurological abnormalities, familial schizophrenia, sporadic schizophrenia, first-degree relatives, brain dysfunction, genetic susceptibility
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nervous System Diseases, Neurologic Examination, Prospective Studies, Schizophrenia, Observer Variation, Prevalence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review