The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials
Open accessAbstract
Transcranial stimulation has become an established method in the evaluation of corticospinal tract function. Clinical studies mainly address slowing of conduction through measurement of increased central conduction time (CCT) and 'failures' of conduction through observation of marked reductions in the size of the motor evoked potential (MEP). While CCT is of great interest in detecting subclinical slowing of conduction, the method discloses only gross failures of conduction, since the size of the MEP varies markedly between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another, leading to a broad range of normal values. Furthermore, transcranial stimulation does not appear to achieve depolarization of all spinal motor neurons leading to the target muscles, since in most normal subjects MEPs are smaller in amplitude than the responses evoked by peripheral nerve stimulation. We have developed a triple stimulation technique (TST) which, through two collisions, links central to peripheral conduction and suppresses desynchronization of MEPs. This technique shows that transcranial stimulation does achieve depolarization of all, or nearly all, spinal motor neurons supplying the target muscle in healthy subjects. Our data thus demonstrate that the amplitudes of MEPs are (i) smaller than those of peripheral responses, mostly due to phase cancellation of the action potentials caused by the desynchronization occurring within the corticospinal tract or at spinal cell level and (ii) variable between normal subjects and from one stimulus to another, mostly due to variability of this desynchronization. This technique provides new insights into normal corticospinal tract conduction. It will improve detection and quantification of central motor conduction failures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rossi, S., Hallett, M., Rossini, P. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016 · Cited by 5,367
Rossini, P. M., Burke, D., Chen, R., Cohen, L. G., Daskalakis, Z., Di Iorio, R., Di Lazzaro, V., Ferreri, F., Fitzgerald, P. B., George, M. S., et al. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001 · Cited by 2,753
Siebner, H. R., Funke, K., Aberra, A. S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Chen, R., Classen, J., Davare, M., Di Lazzaro, V., Fox, P. T., et al. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022 · Cited by 566
Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population
Wassermann, E. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00144-x · Cited by 462
Pell, G. S., Roth, Y., & Zangen, A. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.003 · Cited by 406
Metadata
- Authors
- Magistris, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-03-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 437-450
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2096715579
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/121.3.437
- The paper
- Magistris, M. (1998). Transcranial stimulation excites virtually all motor neurons supplying the target muscle. A demonstration and a method improving the study of motor evoked potentials. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.3.437
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.