The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing
Abstract
We examined the brain areas involved in discourse processing by using functional MRI in 10 individuals as they read paragraphs, with or without a title, word by word for comprehension. Functional data were collected from 20 adjacent 5 mm axial slices. Discourse processing was associated with activation in inferior frontal and temporal regions of both cerebral hemispheres in the titled and untitled conditions. Moreover, there was substantially more right hemisphere activation for untitled than for the titled paragraphs. More specifically we found: (i) greater activation in the inferior temporal sulcus of both hemispheres for untitled than titled paragraphs; (ii) greater average volume of activation in response to untitled than titled paragraphs in the middle temporal sulcus of the right hemisphere and the reverse pattern in the left middle temporal sulcus. Consistent with previous studies of individuals with right hemisphere damage, we suggest that the right middle temporal regions may be especially important for integrative processes needed to achieve global coherence during discourse processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension.
Fletcher, P. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-r · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Bookheimer, S. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 · Cited by 1,450
Event perception: a mind-brain perspective
Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., Braver, T. S., & Reynolds, J. R. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.273 · Cited by 1,148
Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language
Jung-Beeman, M. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009 · Cited by 908
The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension
Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20422 · Cited by 703
The cognitive neuroscience of insight
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115154 · Cited by 654
Metadata
- Authors
- St George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, A., & Sereno, M. I.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1317-1325
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2150491487
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/122.7.1317
- The paper
- St George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, A., & Sereno, M. I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/122.7.1317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
