The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia
Abstract
Neuropsychological studies have revealed different subtypes of dyscalculia, including dissociations between exact calculation and approximation abilities, and an impact of number size on performance. To understand the origins of these effects, we measured cerebral activity with functional MRI at 3 Tesla and event-related potentials while healthy volunteers performed exact and approximate calculation tasks with small and large numbers. Bilateral intraparietal, precentral, dorsolateral and superior prefrontal regions showed greater activation during approximation, while the left inferior prefrontal cortex and the bilateral angular regions were more activated during exact calculation. Increasing number size during exact calculation led to increased activation in the same bilateral intraparietal regions as during approximation, as well the left inferior and superior frontal gyri. Event-related potentials gave access to the temporal dynamics of calculation processes, showing that effects of task and of number size could be found as early as 200-300 ms following problem presentation. Altogether, the results reveal two cerebral networks for number processing. Rote arithmetic operations with small numbers have a greater reliance on left-lateralized regions, presumably encoding numbers in verbal format. Approximation and exact calculation with large numbers, however, put heavier emphasis on the left and right parietal cortices, which may encode numbers in a non-verbal quantity format. Subtypes of dyscalculia can be explained by lesions disproportionately affecting only one of these networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · Cited by 2,706
The neural correlates of the verbal component of working memory
Paulesu, E., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362342a0 · Cited by 2,230 · cited 2×
“The latter region, which has been associated with phonological processing (Paulesu et al., 1993; Price, 1998), may be involved in the fast retrieval of highly overlearned small addition facts, while the former may reflect processes requiring more effort associated with the lesser known facts involving large numbers.”
BackgroundPractice-related Changes in Human Brain Functional Anatomy during Nonmotor Learning
Raichle, M. E., Fiez, J. A., Videen, T. O., MacLeod, A.-M. K., Pardo, J. V., Fox, P. T., & Petersen, S. E. (1994) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/4.1.8 · Cited by 1,593
Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., Moortele, P. F. V. D., & Dehaene, S. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563689 · Cited by 591
Self-citation
Cited by
Simon, O., Mangin, J.-F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00575-5 · Cited by 769
Self-citationModulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task
Pinel, P., Dehaene, S., Rivière, D., & LeBihan, D. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0913 · Cited by 685
Self-citationFunctional specificity for high-level linguistic processing in the human brain
Fedorenko, E., Behr, M. K., & Kanwisher, N. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1112937108 · Cited by 595
Naccache, L. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.10.966 · Cited by 435
Grabner, R. H., Ansari, D., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neuper, C. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.013 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P.-F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2240-2255
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2260773413
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/123.11.2240
- The paper
- Stanescu-Cosson, R., Pinel, P., van de Moortele, P.-F., Le Bihan, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2000). Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/123.11.2240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.