The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults
Abstract
By systematically reviewing the literature, we have found that there is very little information about the frequency and clinical course of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) of the brain in adults because the methods of most studies have been flawed, and AVMs tend to be treated once they are discovered. The incidence of AVMs is approximately 1 per 100 000 per year in unselected populations, and the point prevalence in adults is approximately 18 per 100 000. AVMs account for between 1 and 2% of all strokes, 3% of strokes in young adults, 9% of subarachnoid haemorrhages and, of all primary intracerebral haemorrhages, they are responsible for 4% overall, but for as much as one-third in young adults. AVMs are far less common causes of first presentations with unprovoked seizures (1%), and of people presenting with headaches in the absence of neurological signs (0.3%). At the time of detection, at least 15% of people affected by AVMs are asymptomatic, about one-fifth present with seizures and for approximately two-thirds of them the dominant mode of presentation is with intracranial haemorrhage. The limited high quality data available on prognosis suggest that long-term crude annual case fatality is 1-1.5%, the crude annual risk of first occurrence of haemorrhage from an unruptured AVM is approximately 2%, but the risk of recurrent haemorrhage may be as high as 18% in the first year, with uncertainty about the risk thereafter. For untreated AVMs, the annual risk of developing de novo seizures is 1%. There is a pressing need for large, prospective studies of the frequency and clinical course of AVMs in well-defined, stable populations, taking account of their prognostic heterogeneity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T. R., & Feinstein, A. R. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00236-3 · Cited by 9,655
Cited by
Predictors of hemorrhage in patients with untreated brain arteriovenous malformation
Stapf, C., Mast, H., Sciacca, R. R., Choi, J. H., Khaw, A. V., Connolly, E. S., Pile-Spellman, J., & Mohr, J. P. (2006) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000210524.68507.87 · Cited by 788
Al-Shahi, R., Bhattacharya, J. J., Currie, D. G., Papanastassiou, V., Ritchie, V., Roberts, R. C., Sellar, R. J., & Warlow, C. P. (2003) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000069018.90456.c9 · Cited by 451
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Shahi, R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1900-1926
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1858061569
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/124.10.1900
- The paper
- Al-Shahi, R. (2001). A systematic review of the frequency and prognosis of arteriovenous malformations of the brain in adults. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.10.1900
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.