The DOI matches its Crossref record.
HEMISPHERIC SPECIALIZATION IN NORMAL MAN STUDIED BY BILATERAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW: A STUDY WITH THE 133-XE INHALATION TECHNIQUE
Abstract
Changes of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) during mental activation have so far only been studied unilaterally by means of the intracarotid 133Xe injection technique. In the present study bilateral rCBF measurements were made by the 133Xe inhalation technique during mental activities supposed to engage the hemispheres selectively. The study was carried out on 24 normal right-handed male volunteers by the short 133Xe inhalation method. Fourteen scintilation detectors were placed in parallel overcorresponding regions of the two hemispheres. Four rCBF measurements were made on each subject during three randomized conditions: (1) Rest (two studies); (2) Verbal test (Miller Analogy Test), and (3) Spatial test (Street). The recordings were separated by at least one hour to avoid contamination from previous measurement. The answers to the problems were given either by raising the fingers of the left hand (Verbal test) or after the study (Spatial test). In order to investigate the effects of increased motivation 12 of the subjects were promised an extra money reward in addition to the basic payment, if they performed above a certain level on the tests. Small but statistically significant differences between the average hemisphere flows were recorded during the two tests. In the highest motivated (paid) group the verbal test increased the flow in the left hemisphere by 16 per cent while the right-sided increase was significantly smaller, 13 per cent (P less than 0-001). The corresponding figures for the spatial test were: left 7 per cent, right 10 per cent (P less than 0-01). The same tendencies were seen in the less motivated group although the hemisphere differences were smaller and statistically not significant. Analysis of the regional results showed that the largest interhemispheric differences (about 5 per cent) were seen in occipital and parietal regions during the verbal test and in frontal and parietal regions during the spatial test. It is concluded that bilateral measurements of rCBF can be used with advantage in the study of lateralization of mental functions in the human brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sex and Handedness Differences in Cerebral Blood Flow During Rest and Cognitive Activity
Gur, R. C., Gur, R. E., Obrist, W. D., Hungerbuhler, J. P., Younkin, D., Rosen, A. D., Skolnick, B. E., & Reivich, M. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7089587 · Cited by 438
Unterrainer, J., Wranek, U., Staffen, W., Gruber, T., & Ladurner, G. (2000) · Neuropsychobiology · doi:10.1159/000026639 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- RISBERG, J., HALSEY, J. H., WILLS, E. L., & WILSON, E. M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1975
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 511-524
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2259200362
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: HEMISPHERIC SPECIALIZATION IN NORMAL MAN STUDIED BY BILATERAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW: A STUDY WITH THE 133-XE INHALATION TECHNIQUE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/98.3.511
- The paper
- RISBERG, J., HALSEY, J. H., WILLS, E. L., & WILSON, E. M. (1975). HEMISPHERIC SPECIALIZATION IN NORMAL MAN STUDIED BY BILATERAL MEASUREMENTS OF THE REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW: A STUDY WITH THE 133-XE INHALATION TECHNIQUE. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/98.3.511
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.