The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MRI-negative PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy: a distinct surgically remediable syndrome
Abstract
Most patients with non-lesional temporal lobe epilepsy (NLTLE) will have the findings of hippocampal sclerosis (HS) on a high resolution MRI. However, a significant minority of patients with NLTLE and electroclinically well-lateralized temporal lobe seizures have no evidence of HS on MRI. Many of these patients have concordant hypometabolism on fluorodeoxyglucose-PET ([18F]FDG-PET). The pathophysiological basis of this latter group remains uncertain. We aimed to determine whether NLTLE without HS on MRI represents a variant of or a different clinicopathological syndrome from that of NLTLE with HS on MRI. The clinical, EEG, [18F]FDG-PET, histopathological and surgical outcomes of 30 consecutive NLTLE patients with well-lateralized EEG but without HS on MRI (HS-ve TLE) were compared with 30 consecutive age- and sex-matched NLTLE patients with well-lateralized EEG with HS on MRI (HS+ve TLE). Both the HS+ve TLE group and the HS-ve TLE patients had a high degree of [18F]FDG-PET concordant lateralization (26 out of 30 HS-ve TLE versus 27 out of 27 HS+ve TLE). HS-ve TLE patients had more widespread hypometabolism on [18F]FDG-PET by blinded visual analysis [odds ratio (OR = + infinity (2.51, -), P = 0.001]. The HS-ve TLE group less frequently had a history of febrile convulsions [OR = 0.077 (0.002-0.512), P = 0.002], more commonly had a delta rhythm at ictal onset [OR = 3.67 (0.97-20.47), P = 0.057], and less frequently had histopathological evidence of HS [OR = 0 (0-0.85), P = 0.031]. There was no significant difference in surgical outcome despite half of those without HS having a hippocampal-sparing procedure. Based on the findings outlined, HS-ve PET-positive TLE may be a surgically remediable syndrome distinct from HS+ve TLE, with a pathophysiological basis that primarily involves lateral temporal neocortical rather than mesial temporal structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cited by
Surgical outcomes in lesional and non-lesional epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Téllez-Zenteno, J. F., Ronquillo, L. H., Moien-Afshari, F., & Wiebe, S. (2010) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2010.02.007 · Cited by 787
Hippocampal sclerosis—Origins and imaging
Malmgren, K., & Thom, M. (2012) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2012.03610.x · Cited by 273
Impairments in oxidative glucose metabolism in epilepsy and metabolic treatments thereof
McDonald, T., Puchowicz, M., & Borges, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2018.00274 · Cited by 77
Surgical outcome in patients with MRI-negative, PET-positive temporal lobe epilepsy
Yıldırım Capraz, I., Kurt, G., Akdemir, Ö., Hirfanoglu, T., Oner, Y., Sengezer, T., Atay Kapucu, L. O., Serdaroglu, A., & Bilir, E. (2015) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2015.03.015 · Cited by 70
Elisevich, K., Shukla, N., Moran, J. E., Smith, B., Schultz, L., Mason, K., Barkley, G. L., Tepley, N., Gumenyuk, V., & Bowyer, S. M. (2011) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1167.2011.02990.x · Cited by 66
Rostampour, M., Hashemi, H., Najibi, S. M., & Oghabian, M. A. (2018) · Physica Medica · doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.03.005 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Carne, R. P., O'Brien, T. J., Kilpatrick, C. J., MacGregor, L. R., Hicks, R. J., Murphy, M. A., Bowden, S. C., Kaye, A. H., & Cook, M. J.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07-28
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2276-2285
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2157110486
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.