The DOI matches its Crossref record.
O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas
Abstract
MRI is commonly used to determine the location and extent of cerebral gliomas. We investigated whether the diagnostic accuracy of MRI could be improved by the additional use of PET with the amino acid O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET). In a prospective study, PET with FET and MRI was performed in 31 patients with suspected cerebral gliomas. PET and MRIs were co-registered and 52 neuronavigated tissue biopsies were taken from lesions with both abnormal MRI signal and increased FET uptake (match), as well as from areas with abnormal MR signal but normal FET uptake or vice versa (mismatch). Biopsy sites were labelled by intracerebral titanium pellets. The diagnostic performance for the identification of cellular tumour tissue was analysed for either MRI alone or MRI combined with FET PET using alternative free response receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs). Histologically, 26 biopsy samples corresponded to cellular glioma tissue and 26 to peritumoral brain tissue. The diagnostic performance, as determined by the area under the ROC curve (Az), was Az = 0.80 for MRI alone and Az = 0.98 for the combined MRI and FET PET approach (P < 0.001). MRI yielded a sensitivity of 96% for the detection of tumour tissue but a specificity of only 53%, and combined use of MRI and FET PET yielded a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 94%. Combined use of MRI and FET PET in patients with cerebral gliomas significantly improves the identification of cellular glioma tissue and allows definite histological tumour diagnosis. Thus, our findings may have considerable impact on target selection for diagnostic biopsies as well as therapy planning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Albert, N. L., Weller, M., Suchorska, B., Galldiks, N., Soffietti, R., Kim, M. M., la Fougère, C., Pope, W., Law, I., Arbizu, J., et al. (2016) · Neuro-Oncology · doi:10.1093/neuonc/now058 · Cited by 744
Advances in neuro-oncology imaging
Langen, K.-J., Galldiks, N., Hattingen, E., & Shah, N. J. (2017) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.44 · Cited by 339
Diagnostic and Therapeutic Biomarkers in Glioblastoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Szopa, W., Burley, T. A., Kramer-Marek, G., & Kaspera, W. (2017) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2017/8013575 · Cited by 320
Grosu, A.-L., Astner, S. T., Riedel, E., Nieder, C., Wiedenmann, N., Heinemann, F., Schwaiger, M., Molls, M., Wester, H.-J., & Weber, W. A. (2011) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.002 · Cited by 253
Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation
Rogasch, J. M. M., Hofheinz, F., van Heek, L., Voltin, C.-A., Boellaard, R., & Kobe, C. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020451 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Pauleit, D.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-01-05
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 678-687
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2086465998
- Cited by
- 634
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh399
- The paper
- Pauleit, D. (2005). O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.