Cited by 174Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryTactile and Sensory InteractionsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Structural and functional plasticity in the somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients

Schaechter, J. D.·2006·Brain

Abstract

Animal studies have demonstrated that motor recovery after hemiparetic stroke is associated with functional and structural brain plasticity. While studies in stroke patients have revealed functional plasticity in sensorimotor cortical areas in association with motor recovery, corresponding structural plasticity has not been shown. We sought to test the hypothesis that chronic hemiparetic stroke patients exhibit structural plasticity in the same sensorimotor cortical areas that exhibit functional plasticity. Functional MRI during unilateral tactile stimulation and structural MRI was conducted in chronic stroke patients and normal subjects. Using recently developed computational methods for high-resolution analysis of MRI data, we evaluated for between-group differences in functional activation responses, and cortical thickness of areas that showed an enhanced activation response in the patients. We found a significant (P < 0.005) increase in the activation response in areas of the ventral postcentral gyrus (POG) in the patients relative to controls. These same ventral POG areas showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in cortical thickness in the patients. Control cortical areas did not show a significant between-group difference in thickness or activation response. These results provide the first evidence of structural plasticity co-localized with areas exhibiting functional plasticity in the human brain after stroke.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awl214

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, good functional recovery after stroke is associated with remapping of sensorimotor function in motor, somatosensory and premotor circuits and is accompanied by increases in cortical thickness in these reorganizing areas.

    “In humans, good functional recovery after stroke is associated with remapping of sensorimotor function in motor, somatosensory and premotor circuits5,6 and is accompanied by increases in cortical thickness in these reorganizing areas7.”
  • In humans, the initial cloning studies of GAP43 showed that it is induced in peri-infarct cortex after stroke and increases cortical thickness in regions of cortical map plasticity during recovery.

    “In humans, the initial cloning studies of GAP43, the paradigmatic neuronal growth cone marker, showed that it is induced in peri-infarct cortex after stroke39 and increases cortical thickness in regions of cortical map plasticity during recovery7.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 64 · Cited by 174

Authors
Schaechter, J. D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Schaechter, J. D.
Venue
Brain
Published
2006-07-15
Volume
129
Issue
10
Pages
2722-2733
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2166555769
Cited by
174
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American Health Assistance Foundation
  • American Heart Association
  • Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
  • National Institutes of Health (RR14075)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR-14075, RR 14075, P41RR014075)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD044425)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
chronic stroke, hemiparesis, somatosensory cortex, structural plasticity, functional plasticity, cortical thickness, tactile stimulation, sensorimotor cortex, motor recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Neuronal Plasticity, Somatosensory Cortex, Case-Control Studies, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review