A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia
Abstract
Traditional cognitive tests may not be sensitive for the early detection of executive and social cognitive impairments in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. The aim of this study was to detect specific executive and social cognitive deficits in patients with early behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia using a battery of tests previously shown to be sensitive to frontal lobe dysfunction. Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia patients and paired controls were assessed with a complete standard neuropsychological battery evaluating attention, memory, visuospatial abilities, language and executive functions. All participants were then assessed with our Executive and Social Cognition Battery, which included Theory of Mind tests (Mind in the Eyes, Faux Pas), the Hotel Task, Multiple Errands Task-hospital version and the Iowa Gambling Task for complex decision-making. Patients were divided into two groups according to their Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination scores, a measure of general cognitive status. Low Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination patients differed from controls on most tasks of the standard battery and the Executive and Social Cognition Battery. While high Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination patients did not differ from controls on most traditional neuropsychological tests, significant differences were found between this high-functioning behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia group and controls on most measures of our Executive and Social Cognition Battery. Our results suggest that the Executive and Social Cognition Battery used in this study is more sensitive in detecting executive and social cognitive impairment deficits in early behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia than the classical cognitive measures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Eyes Test scores show convergent validity evidence with other ToM measures, specifically scores from the Strange Stories Test and the Faux Pas Test.
“The results of several studies suggest that the Eyes Test scores show convergent validity evidence with other ToM measures, specifically scores from the Strange Stories Test and the Faux Pas Test (Torralva et al., 2009; Ferguson and Austin, 2010; Kirkland et al., 2012a), however, others have found no relation (Ahmed and Miller, 2011; Duval et al., 2011).”
From A psychometric analysis of the reading the mind in the eyes test: toward a brief form for research and applied settings (2015) · cites this paper as Torralva et al., 2009
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 302
- Authors
- Torralva, T., Roca, M., Gleichgerrcht, E., Bekinschtein, T., & Manes, F.
- Affiliations
- Favaloro University (AR)
- Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva (AR)
- Corresponding author
- Torralva, Teresa
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-03-31
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1299-1309
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2022454955
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 12.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, executive dysfunction, social cognitive impairment, theory of mind, early detection, Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination, Iowa Gambling Task, faux pas, frontal lobe dysfunction
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Behavior, Case-Control Studies, Area Under Curve
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review