Cited by 93Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPeripheral Neuropathies and DisordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Greater loss of axons in primary progressive multiple sclerosis plaques compared to secondary progressive disease

Tallantyre, E. C., Bo, L., Al-Rawashdeh, O., Owens, T., Polman, C. H., Lowe, J., Evangelou, N.·2009·Brain

Abstract

The pathological substrate of progressive disability in multiple sclerosis is hypothesized to be axonal loss. Differences in the demographic, pathological and radiological features of patients with primary progressive compared with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis raise the question as to whether they actually represent separate clinical entities. So far, large pathological studies comparing axonal damage between primary progressive and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis have not been reported. In this clinico-pathological study we examined the cervical spinal cord in patients with primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Human cervical spinal cord was derived at autopsy from 54 patients (17 primary progressive, 30 secondary progressive and 7 controls). Tissue was stained immunohistochemically and examined to determine: (i) the number of surviving corticospinal tract axons; (ii) the extent of grey and white matter demyelination; (iii) the degree of inflammation inside and outside of lesions; and (iv) the relationship between demyelination and axonal loss. Associated clinical data was used to calculate expanded disability status scale for each patient preceding death. Motor disability in the primary progressive and secondary progressive groups was similar preceding death. Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis patients showed considerably more extensive demyelination of both the white and grey matter of the cervical spinal cord. The total number of corticospinal axons was equally low in primary progressive and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis groups versus controls. The reduction of axonal density in demyelinated regions compared to normal appearing white matter was significantly more extensive in primary progressive versus secondary progressive patients (33% reduction versus 16% reduction, P < 0.001). These findings suggest axonal loss is the pathological substrate of progressive disability in both primary progressive and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with a common plaque-centred mechanism. More extensive axonal loss within areas of demyelination in primary progressive multiple sclerosis could explain high levels of axonal loss observed in these patients despite low levels of demyelination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awp106

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spinal cord pathology is an important determinant of permanent neurological disability in multiple sclerosis, with cardinal characteristics being inflammatory demyelination, synaptic, neuronal and axonal loss.

    “Spinal cord pathology is an important determinant of permanent neurological disability with cardinal characteristics being inflammatory demyelination, synaptic, neuronal and axonal loss.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11”

    From Neurite dispersion: a new marker of multiple sclerosis spinal cord pathology? (2017) · cites this paper as [8]

    The Introduction (page not provided) links inflammatory demyelination to relapse disability and describes neuro-axonal pathology as a hypothesized explanation for progressive disability. The study examines cervical spinal cord demyelination, inflammation and axonal loss, but our copy does not establish synaptic or neuronal loss as cardinal characteristics, and it hedges rather than establishes the cause of permanent disability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Agosta F, Absinta M, Sormani MP, Ghezzi A, Bertolotto A, Montanari E, et al. In vivo assessment of cervical cord damage in MS patients: a longitudinal diffusion tensor MRI study. Brain 2007; 130: 2211-9.
  2. Altman J, Bayer SA. An overview of spinal cord organization. Development of the human spinal cord. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. pp. 3-87.
  3. Batchelor PE, Tan S, Wills TE, Porritt MJ, Howells DW. Comparison of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord following mechanical injury. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25: 1217-25.
  4. Bergers E, Bot JCJ, De Groot CJA, Polman CH, Lycklama a `Nijeholt GJ, Castelijns JA, et al. Axonal damage in the spinal cord of MS patients occurs largely independent of T2 MRI lesions. Neurology 2002; 59: 1766-71.
  5. Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland H, Trapp BD, Mork SJ. Intracortical multiple sclerosis lesions are not associated with increased lymphocyte infiltration. Mult Scler 2003a; 9: 323-31.
  6. Bo L, Vedeler CA, Nyland HI, Trapp BD, Mork SJ. Subpial demyelination in the cerebral cortex of multiple sclerosis patients. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2003b; 62: 723-32.
  7. Confavreux C, Vukusic S, Moreau T, Adeleine P. Relapses and progres- sion of disability in multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 1430-8.
  8. Cucurella MG, Rovira A, Rio J, Pedraza S, Tintore MM, Montalban X, et al. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. NMR Biomed 2000; 13: 57-63.
  9. David S, Bouchard C, Tsatas O, Giftochristos N. Macrophages can modify the nonpermissive nature of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Neuron 1990; 5: 463-9.
  10. Evangelou N, Esiri MM, Smith S, Palace J, Matthews PM. Quantitative pathological evidence for axonal loss in normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2000a; 47: 391-5.
  11. Filippi M, Bozzali M, Horsfield MA, Rocca MA, Sormani MP, Iannucci G, et al. A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MS. Neurology 2000a; 54: 207-13.
  12. Filippi M, Inglese M, Rovaris M, Sormani MP, Horsfield P, Iannucci PG, et al. Magnetization transfer imaging to monitor the evolution of MS: a 1-year follow-up study. Neurology 2000b; 55: 940-6.
  13. Fisher E, Rudick RA, Cutter G, Baier M, Miller D, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. Relationship between brain atrophy and disability: an 8-year follow-up study of multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2000; 6: 373-7.
  14. Fleming JC, Norenberg MD, Ramsay DA, Dekaban GA, Marcillo AE, Saenz AD, et al. The cellular inflammatory response in human spinal cords after injury. Brain 2006; 129: 3249-69.
  15. Ganter P, Prince C, Esiri MM. Spinal cord axonal loss in multiple sclerosis: a post-mortem study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1999; 25: 459-67.
  16. Ge Y, Grossman RI, Udupa JK, Wei L, Mannon LJ, Polansky M, et al. Brain atrophy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: longitudinal quantitative analysis. Radiology 2000; 214: 665-70.
  17. Geurts JJ, Bo L, Pouwels PJ, Castelijns JA, Polman CH, Barkhof F. Cortical lesions in multiple sclerosis: combined postmortem MR imaging and histopathology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 572-7.
  18. Gilmore CP, Bo L, Owens T, Lowe J, Esiri MM, Evangelou N. Spinal cord gray matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis-a novel pattern of residual plaque morphology. Brain Pathol 2006; 16: 202-8.
  19. Gilmore CP, DeLuca GC, Bo L, Owens T, Lowe J, Esiri MM, et al. Spinal cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis caused by white matter volume loss. Arch Neurol 2005; 62: 1859-62.
  20. Gilmore CP, Donaldson I, Bo L, Owens T, Lowe J, Evangelou N. Regional variations in the extent and pattern of grey matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis: a comparison between the cerebral cortex, cerebellar cortex, deep grey matter nuclei and the spinal cord. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2009; 80: 182-7.
  21. Hirschberg DL, Yoles E, Belkin M, Schwartz M. Inflammation after axonal injury has conflicting consequences for recovery of function: rescue of spared axons is impaired but regeneration is supported. J Neuroimmunol 1994; 50: 9-16.
  22. Ingle GT, Stevenson VL, Miller DH, Thompson AJ. Primary progressive multiple sclerosis: a 5-year clinical and MR study. Brain 2003; 126: 2528-36.
  23. Kameyama T, Hashizume Y, Ando T, Takahashi A. Morphometry of the normal cadaveric cervical spinal cord. Spine 1994; 19: 2077-81.
  24. Kidd D, Thorpe JW, Kendall BE, Barker GJ, Miller DH, McDonald WI, et al. MRI dynamics of brain and spinal cord in progressive multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 60: 15-9.
  25. Kidd D, Thorpe JW, Thompson AJ, Kendall BE, Moseley IF, MacManus DG, et al. Spinal cord MRI using multi-array coils and fast spin echo. II. Findings in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1993; 43: 2632-7.
  26. Kornek B, Storch MK, Weissert R, Wallstroem E, Stefferl A, Olsson T, et al. Multiple sclerosis and chronic autoimmune encephalo- myelitis: a comparative quantitative study of axonal injury in active, inactive, and remyelinated lesions. Am J Pathol 2000; 157: 267-76.
  27. Kremenchutzky M, Rice GP, Baskerville J, Wingerchuk DM, Ebers GC. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: a geographically based study 9: observations on the progressive phase of the disease. Brain 2006; 129: 584-94.
  28. Kutzelnigg A, Lucchinetti CF, Stadelmann C, Bruck W, Rauschka H, Bergmann M, et al. Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis. Brain 2005; 128: 2705-12.
  29. Lechner-Scott J, Kappos L, Hofman M, Polman CH, Ronner H, Montalban X, et al. Can the Expanded Disability Status Scale be assessed by telephone? Mult Scler 2003; 9: 154-9.
  30. Prineas JW, Kwon EE, Cho ES, Sharer LR, Barnett MH, Oleszak EL, et al. Immunopathology of secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 646-57.
  31. Rovaris M, Bozzali M, Santuccio G, Ghezzi A, Caputo D, Montanari E, et al. In vivo assessment of the brain and cervical cord pathology of patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain 2001; 124: 2540-9.
  32. Rovaris M, Bozzali M, Santuccio G, Iannucci G, Sormani MP, Colombo B, et al. Relative contributions of brain and cervical cord pathology to multiple sclerosis disability: a study with magnetisation transfer ratio histogram analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2000; 69: 723-7.
  33. Schnell L, Fearn S, Klassen H, Schwab ME, Perry VH. Acute inflammatory responses to mechanical lesions in the CNS: differences between brain and spinal cord. Eur J Neurosci 1999a; 11: 3648-58.
  34. Schnell L, Fearn S, Schwab ME, Perry VH, Anthony DC. Cytokine- induced acute inflammation in the brain and spinal cord. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1999b; 58: 245-54.
  35. Stevenson VL, Miller DH, Rovaris M, Barkhof F, Brochet B, Dousset V, et al. Primary and transitional progressive MS: a clinical and MRI cross- sectional study. Neurology 1999; 52: 839-45.
  36. Thompson AJ, Kermode AG, MacManus DG, Kendall BE, Kingsley DP, Moseley IF, et al. Patterns of disease activity in multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Br Med J 1990; 300: 631-4.
  37. Thompson AJ, Kermode AG, Wicks D, MacManus DG, Kendall BE, Kingsley DP, et al. Major differences in the dynamics of primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1991; 29: 53-62.
  38. Tortorella C, Viti B, Bozzali M, Sormani MP, Rizzo G, Gilardi MF, et al. A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MS. Neurology 2000; 54: 186-93.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tallantyre, E. C., Bo, L., Al-Rawashdeh, O., Owens, T., Polman, C. H., Lowe, J., & Evangelou, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB)
Venue
Brain
Published
2009-05-01
Volume
132
Issue
5
Pages
1190-1199
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2126802540
Cited by
93
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Multiple Sclerosis Society
  • Research Councils UK
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
primary progressive multiple sclerosis, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis, axonal loss, demyelination, corticospinal tract, cervical spinal cord, multiple sclerosis plaques, white matter demyelination, inflammation, disability progression, Expanded Disability Status Scale
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Axons, Cell Count, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Degeneration, Spinal Cord, Staining and Labeling, Chi-Square Distribution, Case-Control Studies, Statistics, Nonparametric, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review