Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 440

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A hypoxic niche regulates glioblastoma stem cells through hypoxia inducible factor 2α

Open access
Seidel, Sascha, Garvalov, Boyan K., Wirta, Valtteri, von Stechow, Louise, Schänzer, Anne, Meletis, Konstantinos, Wolter, Marietta, Sommerlad, Daniel, Henze, Anne-Theres, Nistér, Monica, Reifenberger, Guido, Lundeberg, Joakim, Frisén, Jonas, Acker, Till·2010·Brain

Abstract

Glioma growth and progression depend on a specialized subpopulation of tumour cells, termed tumour stem cells. Thus, tumour stem cells represent a critical therapeutic target, but the molecular mechanisms that regulate them are poorly understood. Hypoxia plays a key role in tumour progression and in this study we provide evidence that the hypoxic tumour microenvironment also controls tumour stem cells. We define a detailed molecular signature of tumour stem cell genes, which are overexpressed by tumour cells in vascular and perinecrotic/hypoxic niches. Mechanistically, we show that hypoxia plays a key role in the regulation of the tumour stem cell phenotype through hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha and subsequent induction of specific tumour stem cell signature genes, including mastermind-like protein 3 (Notch pathway), nuclear factor of activated T cells 2 (calcineurin pathway) and aspartate beta-hydroxylase domain-containing protein 2. Notably, a number of these genes belong to pathways regulating the stem cell phenotype. Consistently, tumour stem cell signature genes are overexpressed in newly formed gliomas and are associated with worse clinical prognosis. We propose that tumour stem cells are maintained within a hypoxic niche, providing a functional link between the well-established role of hypoxia in stem cell and tumour biology. The identification of molecular regulators of tumour stem cells in the hypoxic niche points to specific signalling mechanisms that may be used to target the glioblastoma stem cell population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awq042

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 440

Metadata

Authors
Seidel, S., Garvalov, B. K., Wirta, V., von Stechow, L., Schänzer, A., Meletis, K., Wolter, M., Sommerlad, D., Henze, A.-T., Nistér, M., Reifenberger, G., Lundeberg, J., Frisén, J., & Acker, T.
Venue
Brain
Published
2010-04
Volume
133
Issue
4
Pages
983-995
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2119593356
Cited by
440
References
53
FWCI
16.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hypoxic niche regulates glioblastoma stem cells through hypoxia inducible factor 2α. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awq042
The paper
Seidel, S., Garvalov, B. K., Wirta, V., von Stechow, L., Schänzer, A., Meletis, K., Wolter, M., Sommerlad, D., Henze, A.-T., Nistér, M., Reifenberger, G., Lundeberg, J., Frisén, J., & Acker, T. (2010). A hypoxic niche regulates glioblastoma stem cells through hypoxia inducible factor 2α. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.