Cited by 37Hereditary Neurological DisordersGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGenomics and Rare Diseases

A mutation in the RNF170 gene causes autosomal dominant sensory ataxia

Valdmanis, Paul N., Dupré, Nicolas, Lachance, Mathieu, Stochmanski, Shawn J., Belzil, Veronique V., Dion, Patrick A., Thiffault, Isabelle, Brais, Bernard +4 more·2011·Brain

Abstract

Autosomal dominant sensory ataxia is a rare genetic condition that results in a progressive ataxia that is caused by degeneration of the posterior columns of the spinal cord. To date only two families have been clinically ascertained with this condition, both from Maritime Canada. We previously mapped both families to chromosome 8p12-8q12 and have now screened the majority of annotated protein-coding genes in the shared haplotype region by direct DNA sequencing. We have identified a putative pathogenic mutation in the gene encoding ring-finger protein RNF170, a potential ubiquitin ligase. This mutation is a rare non-synonymous change in a well-conserved residue and is predicted to be pathogenic by SIFT, PolyPhen, PANTHER and Align-GVD. Microinjection of wild-type or mutant orthologous messenger RNAs into zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos confirmed that the mutation dominantly disrupts normal embryonic development. Together these results suggest that the mutation in RNF170 is causal for the sensory ataxia in these families.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awq329

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valdmanis, P. N., Dupré, N., Lachance, M., Stochmanski, S. J., Belzil, V. V., Dion, P. A., Thiffault, I., Brais, B., Weston, L., Saint-Amant, L., Samuels, M. E., & Rouleau, G. A.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Notre-Dame (CA)
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Horizon Health Network (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
Venue
Brain
Published
2010-11-27
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
602-607
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2136078441
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Hereditary Neurological Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
RING finger protein, ubiquitin ligase, posterior column degeneration, spinal cord degeneration, non-synonymous mutations, pathogenicity prediction, embryonic development, gene mapping, familial ataxia
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Ataxia, Humans, Zebrafish, Cell Death, Mutation, Missense, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Antisense, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Gene Knockdown Techniques, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review