Cited by 429Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAutophagy in Disease and TherapyNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Reversal of autophagy dysfunction in the TgCRND8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease ameliorates amyloid pathologies and memory deficits

Open access
Yang, Dun-Sheng, Stavrides, Philip, Mohan, Panaiyur S., Kaushik, Susmita, Kumar, Asok, Ohno, Masuo, Schmidt, Stephen D., Wesson, Daniel +12 more·2011·Brain

Abstract

Autophagy, a major degradative pathway for proteins and organelles, is essential for survival of mature neurons. Extensive autophagic-lysosomal pathology in Alzheimer's disease brain contributes to Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis, although the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we identified and characterized marked intraneuronal amyloid-β peptide/amyloid and lysosomal system pathology in the Alzheimer's disease mouse model TgCRND8 similar to that previously described in Alzheimer's disease brains. We further establish that the basis for these pathologies involves defective proteolytic clearance of neuronal autophagic substrates including amyloid-β peptide. To establish the pathogenic significance of these abnormalities, we enhanced lysosomal cathepsin activities and rates of autophagic protein turnover in TgCRND8 mice by genetically deleting cystatin B, an endogenous inhibitor of lysosomal cysteine proteases. Cystatin B deletion rescued autophagic-lysosomal pathology, reduced abnormal accumulations of amyloid-β peptide, ubiquitinated proteins and other autophagic substrates within autolysosomes/lysosomes and reduced intraneuronal amyloid-β peptide. The amelioration of lysosomal function in TgCRND8 markedly decreased extracellular amyloid deposition and total brain amyloid-β peptide 40 and 42 levels, and prevented the development of deficits of learning and memory in fear conditioning and olfactory habituation tests. Our findings support the pathogenic significance of autophagic-lysosomal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease and indicate the potential value of restoring normal autophagy as an innovative therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer's disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awq341

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar evidence of accumulated autophagic vacuoles has been found in AD models.

    “Indeed, TEM analysis on post-mortem AD brains revealed the presence of accumulated auto­ phagic vacuoles in dystrophic neurites that are surrounded by neuronal fibrillary tangles (Nixon et al., 2005; Nixon and Cataldo, 2006), and similar evidence have been also found in AD models (Yang et al., 2011; Yu et al., 2005), although none of these studies have been performed on DA neurons.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 89 · Cited by 429

Authors
Yang, D.-S., Stavrides, P., Mohan, P. S., Kaushik, S., Kumar, A., Ohno, M., Schmidt, S. D., Wesson, D., Bandyopadhyay, U., Jiang, Y., Pawlik, M., Peterhoff, C. M., Yang, A. J., Wilson, D. A., St George-Hyslop, P., Westaway, D., Mathews, P. M., Levy, E., Cuervo, A. M., & Nixon, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Brain
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
258-277
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2101487297
Cited by
429
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 30
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (081864)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG017617)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
autophagy, Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta, cystatin B, ubiquitinated proteins, memory impairment, fear conditioning, olfactory habituation
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Autophagy, Brain, Conditioning, Psychological, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Fear, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Immunohistochemistry, Lysosomes, Memory Disorders, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Blotting, Western, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Amyloid beta-Protein Precursor, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review