The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol
Abstract
Super-refractory status epilepticus is defined as status epilepticus that continues or recurs 24 h or more after the onset of anaesthetic therapy, including those cases where status epilepticus recurs on the reduction or withdrawal of anaesthesia. It is an uncommon but important clinical problem with high mortality and morbidity rates. This article reviews the treatment approaches. There are no controlled or randomized studies, and so therapy has to be based on clinical reports and opinion. The published world literature on the following treatments was critically evaluated: anaesthetic agents, anti-epileptic drugs, magnesium infusion, pyridoxine, steroids and immunotherapy, ketogenic diet, hypothermia, emergency resective neurosurgery and multiple subpial transection, transcranial magnetic stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, deep brain stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid and other older drug therapies. The importance of treating the identifying cause is stressed. A protocol and flowchart for managing super-refractory status epilepticus is suggested. In view of the small number of published reports, there is an urgent need for the establishment of a database of outcomes of individual therapies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marchi, N., Granata, T., Freri, E., Ciusani, E., Ragona, F., Puvenna, V., Teng, Q., Alexopolous, A., & Janigro, D. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018200 · Cited by 150
Cited by
Magnesium in man: implications for health and disease
de Baaij, J. H. F., Hoenderop, J. G. J., & Bindels, R. J. M. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00012.2014 · Cited by 1,726
Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Status Epilepticus
Neurocritical Care Society Status Epilepticus Guideline Writing Committee, Brophy, G. M., Bell, R., Claassen, J., Alldredge, B., Bleck, T. P., Glauser, T., LaRoche, S. M., Riviello, J. J., Shutter, L., et al. (2012) · Neurocritical Care · doi:10.1007/s12028-012-9695-z · Cited by 1,623
Manford, M. (2017) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-017-8394-2 · Cited by 299
Cerebrospinal fluid tau proteins in status epilepticus.
Monti, G., Tondelli, M., Giovannini, G., Bedin, R., Nichelli, P. F., Trenti, T., Meletti, S., & Chiari, A. (2015) · Epilepsy & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.030 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Shorvon, S., & Ferlisi, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-09-13
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2802-2818
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2129658473
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awr215
- The paper
- Shorvon, S., & Ferlisi, M. (2011). The treatment of super-refractory status epilepticus: a critical review of available therapies and a clinical treatment protocol. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr215
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.