Cited by 220Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

The Gulf War era multiple sclerosis cohort: age and incidence rates by race, sex and service

Wallin, Mitchell T., Culpepper, William J., Coffman, Parisa, Pulaski, Sarah, Maloni, Heidi, Mahan, Clare M., Haselkorn, Jodie K., Kurtzke, John F. +1 more·2012·Brain

Abstract

We characterize here a new nationwide incident cohort of multiple sclerosis from the US military-veteran population. This cohort provides an update to the only other US nationwide incidence study of multiple sclerosis performed during the 1970s. Medical records and data from the Department of Defense and Department of Veterans Affairs for cases of multiple sclerosis who served in the military between 1990, the start of the Gulf War era, and 2007 and who were service-connected for this disorder by the Department of Veterans Affairs from 1990 on, were reviewed. A total of 2691 patients were confirmed as having multiple sclerosis: 2288 definite, 190 possible, 207 clinically isolated syndrome and six neuromyelitis optica. Overall racial categories were White, Black and other, which included all Hispanics. There were 1278 White males and 556 females; 360 Black males and 296 females; and 200 others, 153 (77%) of whom were Hispanic. Mean age at onset of 30.7 years did not differ significantly by race or sex. Age at onset was 17-50 years in 99%, the same age range as 99% of the military. Average annual age specific (age 17-50 years) incidence rates per 100 000 for the entire series were 9.6 with 95% confidence interval of 9.3-10.0. Rates for Blacks were highest at 12.1 with confidence interval 11.2-13.1, Whites were 9.3 (interval 8.9-9.8) and others 6.9 (interval 6.0-7.9). For 83 Hispanics defined for 2000-07, the rate was 8.2 (interval 6.5-10.1). Much smaller numbers gave rates of 3…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/aws099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 220

Authors
Wallin, M. T., Culpepper, W. J., Coffman, P., Pulaski, S., Maloni, H., Mahan, C. M., Haselkorn, J. K., Kurtzke, J. F., & for the Veterans Affairs Multiple Sclerosis Centres of Excellence Epidemiology Group
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Venue
Brain
Published
2012-05-23
Volume
135
Issue
6
Pages
1778-1785
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2172271216
Cited by
220
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 5
FWCI
11.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, military veterans, incidence rates, age of onset, racial differences, sex differences, clinically isolated syndrome, neuromyelitis optica, veterans' health
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelitis, Transverse, Optic Neuritis, Risk Factors, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Survival Rate, Age of Onset, Racial Groups, Iraq War, 2003-2011

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review