The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke
Abstract
Stroke is a leading cause of adult disability and the recovery of motor function is important for independence in activities of daily living. Predicting motor recovery after stroke in individual patients is difficult. Accurate prognosis would enable realistic rehabilitation goal-setting and more efficient allocation of resources. The aim of this study was to test and refine an algorithm for predicting the potential for recovery of upper limb function after stroke. Forty participants were prospectively enrolled within 3 days of ischaemic stroke. First, shoulder abduction and finger extension strength were graded 72 h after stroke onset to compute a shoulder abduction and finger extension score. Secondly, transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to assess the functional integrity of descending motor pathways to the affected upper limb. Third, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the structural integrity of the posterior limbs of the internal capsules. Finally, these measures were combined in the PREP algorithm for predicting an individual's potential for upper limb recovery at 12 weeks, measured with the Action Research Arm Test. A cluster analysis was used to independently group patients according to Action Research Arm Test score at 12 weeks, for comparison with predictions from the PREP algorithm. There was excellent correspondence between the cluster analysis of Action Research Arm Test score at 12 weeks and predictions made with the PREP algorithm. The algorithm had positive predictive power of 88%, negative predictive power of 83%, specificity of 88% and sensitivity of 73%. This study provides preliminary data in support of the PREP algorithm for the prognosis of upper limb recovery in individual patients. PREP may enable tailored planning of rehabilitation and more accurate stratification of patients in clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL
Smith, S. M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M. W., Beckmann, C. F., Behrens, T. E. J., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P. R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D. E., et al. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051 · Cited by 13,630
Cited by
PREP2: A biomarker‐based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke
Stinear, C. M., Byblow, W. D., Ackerley, S. J., Smith, M., Borges, V. M., & Barber, P. A. (2017) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.488 · Cited by 359
Self-citationPredicting motor outcomes in stroke patients using diffusion Spectrum mri microstructural measures
Hodgson, K., Adluru, G., Richards, L. G., Majersik, J. J., Stoddard, G., Adluru, N., & DiBella, E. (2019) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00072 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Stinear, C. M., Barber, P. A., Petoe, M., Anwar, S., & Byblow, W. D.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-10
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2527-2535
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2149490453
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/aws146
- The paper
- Stinear, C. M., Barber, P. A., Petoe, M., Anwar, S., & Byblow, W. D. (2012). The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aws146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.