Cited by 68Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Passive immunotherapy targeting amyloid-β reduces cerebral amyloid angiopathy and improves vascular reactivity

Bales, Kelly R., O’Neill, Sharon M., Pozdnyakov, Nikolay, Pan, Feng, Caouette, David, Pi, YeQing, Wood, Kathleen M., Volfson, Dmitri +5 more·2016·Brain

Abstract

Prominent cerebral amyloid angiopathy is often observed in the brains of elderly individuals and is almost universally found in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is characterized by accumulation of the shorter amyloid-β isoform(s) (predominantly amyloid-β40) in the walls of leptomeningeal and cortical arterioles and is likely a contributory factor to vascular dysfunction leading to stroke and dementia in the elderly. We used transgenic mice with prominent cerebral amyloid angiopathy to investigate the ability of ponezumab, an anti-amyloid-β40 selective antibody, to attenuate amyloid-β accrual in cerebral vessels and to acutely restore vascular reactivity. Chronic administration of ponezumab to transgenic mice led to a significant reduction in amyloid and amyloid-β accumulation both in leptomeningeal and brain vessels when measured by intravital multiphoton imaging and immunohistochemistry. By enriching for cerebral vascular elements, we also measured a significant reduction in the levels of soluble amyloid-β biochemically. We hypothesized that the reduction in vascular amyloid-β40 after ponezumab administration may reflect the ability of ponezumab to mobilize an interstitial fluid pool of amyloid-β40 in brain. Acutely, ponezumab triggered a significant and transient increase in interstitial fluid amyloid-β40 levels in old plaque-bearing transgenic mice but not in young animals. We also measured a beneficial effect on vascular reactivity following…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awv313

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bales, K. R., O’Neill, S. M., Pozdnyakov, N., Pan, F., Caouette, D., Pi, Y., Wood, K. M., Volfson, D., Cirrito, J. R., Han, B.-H., Johnson, A. W., Zipfel, G. J., & Samad, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
  • 1 Pfizer Neuroscience and Pain Research Unit, 610 Main Street, Cambridge MA 02139, USA
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Brain
Published
2015-10-22
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
563-577
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2231734233
Cited by
68
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
cerebral amyloid angiopathy, Aβ40, passive immunotherapy, anti-amyloid beta antibodies, vascular reactivity, leptomeningeal vessels, Alzheimer's disease, transgenic mice, vascular dysfunction
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Immunization, Passive, Male, Mice, Transgenic, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, Mice, Plaque, Amyloid, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review