The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In vitro cytotoxicity of asbestos and man-made vitreous fibers: roles of fiber length, diameter and composition
Abstract
The present study investigated (i) the impact of various fiber parameters on in vitro toxicity to cells and (ii) the validity of an in vitro test system as a toxic screen for fibrous materials. Chinese hamster ovary cells were exposed in vitro to a series of size-selected inorganic test fibers that represented a range of different diameters, lengths and compositions (glass, refractory ceramic, mineral wool, asbestos). Toxic end-points included inhibition of proliferation, induction of micronuclei and polynuclei and viability. For all compositions tested, toxic effects were similar: a concentration-dependent decrease in proliferation and increase in incidence of morphologically abnormal nuclei with minor decreases in viability. Diameter-dependent differences in toxicity were slight or absent for fiber diameters ranging from 0.3-7 microns when concentration was expressed as number of fibers/cm2. Length-dependent differences in toxicity were, however, striking. EC50 values (concentration in fibers/cm2 that reduced cell proliferation to 50% of unexposed control cultures) plotted against fiber length produced a hyperbolic curve, demonstrating that toxicity increases with fiber length up to 20 microns. All fibers tested fell on this hyperbola. These data suggest that: (a) the primary toxic effect of fibers on CHO cells is the induction of nuclear morphologic alterations resulting in cytostasis; (b) fiber diameter has little or no impact on in vitro toxicity when concentration is ca…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results showed that the proliferation of CHO cells was inhibited in samples whose average length was 1.4 μm; 1.8 μm or 3.3 μm for UICC chrysotile, UICC crocidolite, and short NIEHS crocidolite respectively.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“The other 2 crocidolite samples containing long fibers were more active. In agreement with other studies their average length was higher, i.e. 11.4 μm and 7.7 μm respectively.”
From Quantification of short and long asbestos fibers to assess asbestos exposure: A review of fiber size toxicity (2014) · cites this paper as [85]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The molecular basis of asbestos induced lung injury
Kamp, D. W., & Weitzman, S. A. (1999) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.54.7.638 · Cited by 345
Brown, D. M., Kinloch, I. A., Bangert, U., Windle, A. H., Walter, D. M., Walker, G. S., Scotchford, C. A., Donaldson, K., & Stone, V. (2007) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2007.05.011 · Cited by 271
Boulanger, G., Andujar, P., Pairon, J.-C., Billon-Galland, M.-A., Dion, C., Dumortier, P., Brochard, P., Sobaszek, A., Bartsch, P., Paris, C., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health · doi:10.1186/1476-069x-13-59 · Cited by 176
Role of Mutagenicity in Asbestos Fiber-Induced Carcinogenicity and Other Diseases
Huang, S. X. L., Jaurand, M.-C., Kamp, D. W., Whysner, J., & Hei, T. K. (2011) · Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B · doi:10.1080/10937404.2011.556051 · Cited by 163
Inhaled Asbestos Fibers Induce p53 Expression in the Rat Lung
Mishra, A., Liu, J. Y., Brody, A. R., & Morris, G. F. (1997) · American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1165/ajrcmb.16.4.9115760 · Cited by 47
Interaction of Alveolar Macrophages with Inhaled Mineral Particulates
DÖRGER, M., & KROMBACH, F. (2000) · Journal of Aerosol Medicine · doi:10.1089/jam.2000.13.369 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, G. A., Kathman, L. M., & Hesterberg, T. W.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 971-977
- ISSN
- 0143-3334
- 1460-2180
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review