The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Human exposure and dosimetry of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urine from Xuan Wei, China with high lung cancer mortality associated with exposure to unvented coal smoke
Abstract
The lung cancer mortality rate in Xuan Wei (XW) county, China, is 5-fold the national average of China; the rate for women is the highest in China. Xuan Wei residents have been exposed to unvented coal or wood smoke during cooking or heating in homes. This study investigated indoor air exposure and dosimetry of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in XW residents using smoky coal. Indoor air particles collected during cooking in four XW homes using smoky coal were analyzed for PAHs by GC/MS. Urine samples from 16 XW non-smoking women and six XW smoking men, eight Kunming non-smoking controls and four non-smoking Chinese American controls were analyzed for PAHs and hydroxy-PAHs by GC/MS. The results showed that XW residents were exposed to PAHs at occupational levels. The potent carcinogen, dibenzo[a,l] pyrene (4.9 +/- 1.3 micrograms/m3) was found in the indoor air of the XW homes. The levels of urinary hydroxy-PAH were higher than those of the parent compounds in most subjects, indicating that most PAHs were metabolized. In urine, the mean levels of 9-hydroxy BaP (BaP) and BaP are 1.5 +/- 0.5 mumol/mol creatinine and 0.5 +/- 0.3 microns/mol for XW men, 1.9 +/- 0.9 microns/mol and 0.5 +/- 0.3 microns/mol for XW women. In general, the levels of PAH metabolites in urine were higher in the XW residents than in Kunming and Chinese American controls; however only the concentrations of 9-hydroxy BaP in XW women showed statistically significant difference from the Kunming controls (P < 0.05 by ranking test). The mean levels of 3 methylated-PAHs analyzed were 4.8-fold higher than that of the parent PAHs in XW subjects. This is consistent with previous findings that alkylated PAHs are the major mutagens in the XW indoor air and may be etiologically important in XW lung cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tobacco Smoke Carcinogens and Lung Cancer
Hecht, S. S. (1999) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/91.14.1194 · Cited by 1,976
Respiratory risks from household air pollution in low and middle income countries
Gordon, S. B., Bruce, N. G., Grigg, J., Hibberd, P. L., Kurmi, O. P., Lam, K.-B. H., Mortimer, K., Asante, K. P., Balakrishnan, K., Balmes, J., et al. (2014) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(14)70168-7 · Cited by 953
Health impacts of domestic coal use in China
Finkelman, R. B., Belkin, H. E., & Zheng, B. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.7.3427 · Cited by 329
Guo, Y., Huo, X., Wu, K., Liu, J., Zhang, Y., & Xu, X. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.04.007 · Cited by 133
Indoor air pollution from biomass fuels: a major health hazard in developing countries
Oluwole, O., Otaniyi, O. O., Ana, G. A., & Olopade, C. O. (2012) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-012-0511-1 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Mumford, J. L., Li, X., Hu, F., Lu, X. B., & Chuang, J. C.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3031-3036
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W1989734490
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Human exposure and dosimetry of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urine from Xuan Wei, China with high lung cancer mortality associated with exposure to unvented coal smoke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/16.12.3031
- The paper
- Mumford, J. L., Li, X., Hu, F., Lu, X. B., & Chuang, J. C. (1995). Human exposure and dosimetry of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urine from Xuan Wei, China with high lung cancer mortality associated with exposure to unvented coal smoke. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/16.12.3031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.