The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular epidemiology: recent advances and future directions
Abstract
In 1982 we proposed the concept and a framework for implementing molecular cancer epidemiology. Here, we review progress during the past 17 years in validating and applying this approach to cancer prevention. There have been major advances, notably in the understanding of environment-susceptibility interactions in human cancer. However, a review of major findings to date reveals several urgent research needs to keep pace with the rapid evolution in knowledge of mechanisms in carcinogenesis. Although much valuable progress continues to be made in the study of carcinogens that cause direct DNA damage and are mutagenic, exogenous and endogenous carcinogens can also act by altering gene expression, cell proliferation and differentiation. The mechanisms include aberrant DNA methylation, oxidative damage, effects on metabolism of nitrogen oxide and nitrites, activation of receptors and transcription factors, cyclins and other cell cycle proteins. Sensitive, validated biomarkers are needed to detect these mechanisms in small numbers of cells, tissues or fluids. There is also increasing recognition that individual risk from carcinogen exposure varies as a function of both inherited and acquired factors. Recent advances in genomics, microassay technologies and informatics hold promise for rapid identification of polymorphic variants or changes in expression of genes influencing both response and susceptibility to carcinogens. Another emerging area of molecular epidemiology concerns the role of nutrition and specific dietary factors (including studies on antioxidants, energy metabolism, insulin and various growth factors) and the modulating effect of genetic polymorphisms. Finally, molecular epidemiology has enormous potential in cancer prevention through the early identification of 'at risk' populations and the rapid assessment of intervention efficacy. Its success in fully reaching this potential will depend on the application of validated biomarkers, with adherence to sound epidemiologic and ethical principles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
p53 Mutations in Human Cancers
Hollstein, M., Sidransky, D., Vogelstein, B., & Harris, C. C. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1905840 · Cited by 8,018
Preferential Formation of Benzo[ a ]pyrene Adducts at Lung Cancer Mutational Hotspots in P53
Denissenko, M. F., Pao, A., Tang, M.-S., & Pfeifer, G. P. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.274.5286.430 · Cited by 1,650
Cited by
Biomarkers: Potential uses and limitations
Mayeux, R. (2004) · NeuroRX · doi:10.1602/neurorx.1.2.182 · Cited by 916
Metadata
- Authors
- Perera, F. P., & Weinstein, I. B.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 517-524
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2149853199
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular epidemiology: recent advances and future directions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/21.3.517
- The paper
- Perera, F. P., & Weinstein, I. B. (2000). Molecular epidemiology: recent advances and future directions. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/21.3.517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.